PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 21.47% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 13.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 10.50%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


SMLV

1D
0.24%
1M
2.66%
6M
17.34%
YTD
21.47%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
10.50%

LVHD

1D
0.45%
1M
2.10%
6M
11.64%
YTD
13.28%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
21.47%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.28%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and LVHD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.70

The correlation between SMLV and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMLV vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
LVHD

Financial Services

30.4%
8.2%

Industrials

14.2%
4.9%

Real Estate

12.3%
15.4%

Technology

11.7%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
7.4%

Healthcare

8.7%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
21.8%

Basic Materials

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.8%
24.8%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.6%

Energy

1.6%
7.4%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.4%
LVHD
8.2%

Industrials

SMLV
14.2%
LVHD
4.9%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.3%
LVHD
15.4%

Technology

SMLV
11.7%
LVHD
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.9%
LVHD
7.4%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
LVHD
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.0%
LVHD
21.8%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.4%
LVHD

-

Utilities

SMLV
2.8%
LVHD
24.8%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
LVHD
2.6%

Energy

SMLV
1.6%
LVHD
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLVLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

2.42

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

6.00

+4.29

SMLV vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-37.32%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-6.17%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-14.29%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-16.75%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-37.32%

-5.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.82%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-4.02%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.48%

+0.12%

Volatility

SMLV vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 3.50%, while Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

4.43%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

7.77%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.49%

10.30%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

12.99%

+5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

15.55%

+5.34%

SMLV vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLV vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than LVHD's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.21%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.24%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and LVHD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to SMLV (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, SMLV leads with 10.50% vs 8.14% for LVHD. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.24% for SMLV.

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while LVHD is Dividend. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.27% for LVHD.

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer