SMLV vs. LVHD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and LVHD (Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - SMLV tracks the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index while LVHD tracks the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMLV returned 10.15%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for LVHD. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.

Performance

SMLV vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 7.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 10.15%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.

SMLV

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 14.58%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: 24.52%
• 3Y*: 16.97%
• 5Y*: 8.07%
• 10Y*: 10.15%

LVHD

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -1.09%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 7.40%
• 1Y: 10.89%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: 6.16%
• 10Y*: 8.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	14.58%	5.66%	16.77%	7.52%	-7.69%	27.67%	-1.55%	24.10%	-6.62%	5.68%
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF	7.25%	7.50%	10.18%	-0.95%	-1.82%	26.90%	-1.28%	22.91%	-5.58%	14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and LVHD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2015	0.70

The correlation between SMLV and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMLV vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMLV	LVHD
Financial Services	30.5%	8.6%
Industrials	14.3%	4.6%
Real Estate	12.2%	15.0%
Technology	11.2%	5.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	6.8%
Healthcare	8.7%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	18.5%
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Utilities	2.9%	25.5%
Communication Services	2.2%	3.8%
Energy	1.8%	6.7%

Return for Risk

SMLV vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV

SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 52
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 54

LVHD

LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 33
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMLV	LVHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.15	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	1.70	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.20	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	1.77	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.18	4.49	+4.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMLV vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMLV	LVHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.15	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.48	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.52	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.57	-0.01

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and LVHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMLV	LVHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.45%	-37.32%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.34%	-6.17%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.40%	-14.29%	-6.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.40%	-16.75%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.45%	-37.32%	-5.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.37%	+4.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.46%	-4.05%	-1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	2.43%	+0.25%

Volatility

SMLV vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.89%. This indicates that SMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMLV	LVHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	2.89%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.98%	6.61%	+3.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.75%	9.53%	+6.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.29%	12.87%	+5.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.95%	15.50%	+5.45%

SMLV vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SMLV vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than LVHD's 3.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF	3.39%	3.35%	4.23%	3.55%	3.30%	2.56%	3.27%	3.30%	3.82%	3.33%	2.48%	0.00%
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	2.31%	2.74%	2.68%	2.68%	2.40%	2.12%	2.47%	2.62%	3.15%	7.92%	3.04%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMLV and LVHD in my portfolio?

SMLV and LVHD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMLV or LVHD?

SMLV has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to LVHD (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

Which ETF is better, SMLV or LVHD?

On 10-year performance, SMLV leads with 10.15% vs 8.04% for LVHD. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMLV or LVHD?

Over the 10-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMLV or LVHD?

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMLV or LVHD?

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 2.31% for SMLV.

What is the main difference between SMLV and LVHD?

SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.27% for LVHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.