SMLV vs. FNDA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while FNDA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company US. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMLV returned 10.25%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for FNDA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDA.

Performance

SMLV vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMLV having a 14.81% return and FNDA slightly lower at 14.40%. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has underperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 10.25%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.

SMLV

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 15.50%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: 15.62%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: 10.25%

FNDA

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 14.40%
• 6M: 14.29%
• 1Y: 29.17%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 6.73%
• 10Y*: 10.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	14.81%	5.66%	16.77%	7.52%	-7.69%	27.67%	-1.55%	24.10%	-6.62%	5.68%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	14.40%	7.44%	9.00%	20.29%	-14.83%	31.12%	8.44%	24.34%	-12.12%	12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and FNDA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.90

The correlation between SMLV and FNDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLV vs. FNDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMLV	FNDA
Financial Services	30.5%	14.6%
Industrials	14.3%	18.9%
Real Estate	12.2%	9.9%
Technology	11.2%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	12.2%
Healthcare	8.7%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	4.2%
Basic Materials	3.2%	5.2%
Utilities	2.9%	2.8%
Communication Services	2.2%	4.1%
Energy	1.8%	6.2%

Return for Risk

SMLV vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV

SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 54
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FNDA

FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 59
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMLV	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.70	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.47	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.29	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	3.13	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.78	10.09	-1.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMLV vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and FNDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMLV	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	1.70	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.32	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.48	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.49	+0.06

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and FNDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMLV	FNDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.45%	-44.64%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.34%	-9.36%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.40%	-25.92%	+5.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.40%	-25.92%	+5.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.45%	-44.64%	+2.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.42%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-6.69%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	2.90%	-0.22%

Volatility

SMLV vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 4.09%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMLV	FNDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	4.61%	-0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.92%	11.98%	-2.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	17.24%	-1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.29%	20.91%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.96%	22.39%	-1.43%

SMLV vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SMLV vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than FNDA's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	1.09%	1.22%	1.53%	1.37%	1.38%	1.15%	1.31%	1.38%	1.64%	1.30%	1.18%	1.33%
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	2.31%	2.74%	2.68%	2.68%	2.40%	2.12%	2.47%	2.62%	3.15%	7.92%	3.04%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMLV and FNDA in my portfolio?

SMLV and FNDA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMLV or FNDA?

FNDA has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to SMLV (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs FNDA's -44.64%.

Which ETF is better, SMLV or FNDA?

On 10-year performance, FNDA leads with 10.81% vs 10.25% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMLV or FNDA?

Over the 10-year period, FNDA has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMLV or FNDA?

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMLV or FNDA?

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.09% for FNDA.

What is the main difference between SMLV and FNDA?

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FNDA is Small Cap Blend Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.25% for FNDA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.