SMLV vs. BKLC
SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and BKLC (BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while BKLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMLV returned 8.66%/yr vs 13.79%/yr for BKLC. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BKLC.
Performance
SMLV vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 18.33% return, which is significantly higher than BKLC's 9.04% return.
SMLV
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 18.33%
- 6M
- 15.42%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
BKLC
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- —
SMLV vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 18.33% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | 44.10% |
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 9.04% | 18.06% | 25.56% | 30.88% | -20.52% | 27.41% | 37.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLV and BKLC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SMLV and BKLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMLV vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLV
BKLC
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
SMLV
BKLC
Industrials
SMLV
BKLC
Real Estate
SMLV
BKLC
Technology
SMLV
BKLC
Consumer Cyclical
SMLV
BKLC
Healthcare
SMLV
BKLC
Consumer Defensive
SMLV
BKLC
Basic Materials
SMLV
BKLC
Utilities
SMLV
BKLC
Communication Services
SMLV
BKLC
Energy
SMLV
BKLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLV vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank
SMLV
BKLC
SMLV vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMLV | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 2.69 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 11.95 | -1.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMLV vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and BKLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLV | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.45% | -26.14% | -16.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -9.10% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.40% | -19.05% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -26.14% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.43% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -5.26% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.05% | +0.61% |
Volatility
SMLV vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 3.80%, while BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLV | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 4.60% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 9.87% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 12.63% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 17.23% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 17.47% | +3.48% |
SMLV vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMLV vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison
SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than BKLC's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.24% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLV and BKLC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKLC has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to SMLV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs BKLC's -26.14%.
On 5-year performance, BKLC leads with 13.79% vs 8.66% for SMLV. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 13.79% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMLV.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.03% for BKLC.
SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while BKLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.00% for BKLC.
BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLV and BKLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer