SMIZ vs. IWMI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI).

SMIZ and IWMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMIZ is an actively managed fund by Zacks. It was launched on Oct 2, 2023. IWMI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024.

Performance

SMIZ vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMIZ vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMIZ Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF	0.22%	12.16%	11.08%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	0.93%	14.97%	6.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIZ achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than IWMI's 0.93% return.

SMIZ

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: -0.15%
• 1Y: 23.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWMI

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: -4.05%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: 4.83%
• 1Y: 25.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIZ vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIZ has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.

IWMI

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

SMIZ

Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF

Return for Risk

SMIZ vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIZ

SMIZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
SMIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SMIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SMIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SMIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SMIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 72

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 78
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIZ vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMIZ	IWMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.34	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	1.94	-0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.27	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.97	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.62	9.11	-1.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMIZ vs. IWMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the IWMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIZ and IWMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMIZ	IWMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	1.34	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	0.71	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between SMIZ and IWMI is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SMIZ vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison

SMIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than IWMI's 14.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SMIZ Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF	0.62%	0.62%	1.57%	0.07%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	14.48%	14.05%	8.78%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SMIZ vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIZ drawdown since its inception was -25.04%, roughly equal to the maximum IWMI drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIZ and IWMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMIZ	IWMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.04%	-23.88%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.13%	-12.42%	+0.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.26%	-5.20%	-2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-4.44%	+0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	2.69%	+0.37%

Volatility

SMIZ vs. IWMI - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) at 7.03%. This indicates that SMIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMIZ	IWMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.55%	7.03%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.31%	11.89%	+1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.13%	19.11%	+2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.03%	18.30%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	18.30%	+0.73%