SMIZ vs. GROZ
SMIZ (Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF) and GROZ (Zacks Focus Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMIZ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Zacks, while GROZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Zacks. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMIZ returned 30.97% vs 29.02% for GROZ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.56% expense ratio.
Performance
SMIZ vs. GROZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIZ achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly higher than GROZ's 8.57% return.
SMIZ
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 15.79%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- 30.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GROZ
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMIZ vs. GROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMIZ Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF | 15.79% | 12.16% | -7.69% |
GROZ Zacks Focus Growth ETF | 8.57% | 20.28% | -1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIZ and GROZ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SMIZ and GROZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMIZ vs. GROZ — Risk / Return Rank
SMIZ
GROZ
SMIZ vs. GROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIZ | GROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 1.91 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 2.63 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 2.13 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.82 | 7.90 | +3.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIZ | GROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.91 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.84 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
SMIZ vs. GROZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIZ drawdown since its inception was -25.04%, which is greater than GROZ's maximum drawdown of -23.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIZ and GROZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIZ | GROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.04% | -23.33% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -13.67% | +3.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -1.06% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -4.06% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.69% | -1.06% |
Volatility
SMIZ vs. GROZ - Volatility Comparison
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) at 3.61%. This indicates that SMIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GROZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMIZ | GROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 3.61% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 11.30% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 15.24% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 21.95% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 21.95% | -3.06% |
SMIZ vs. GROZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SMIZ and GROZ have an expense ratio of 0.56%.
Dividends
SMIZ vs. GROZ - Dividend Comparison
SMIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than GROZ's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GROZ Zacks Focus Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMIZ Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 1.57% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMIZ and GROZ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMIZ has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to GROZ (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIZ dropped -25.04% vs GROZ's -23.33%.
On 1-year performance, SMIZ leads with 30.97% vs 29.02% for GROZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.56% expense ratio. On volatility, GROZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMIZ has performed better with a 30.97% return vs 29.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMIZ and GROZ have the same expense ratio: 0.56% per year.
SMIZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.04% for GROZ.
SMIZ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GROZ is Large Cap Growth Equities.
GROZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMIZ and GROZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer