PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIZ vs. VTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMIZ vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMIZ vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
1.24%12.16%17.92%16.39%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.54%12.90%11.55%17.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIZ achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 1.54% return.


SMIZ

1D
1.03%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
1.24%
6M
0.77%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTWO

1D
0.62%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
1.54%
6M
3.49%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMIZ vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIZ has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMIZ vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIZ
SMIZ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SMIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIZ vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMIZVTWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

1.15

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

1.70

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.91

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.96

7.12

+0.84

SMIZ vs. VTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the VTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIZ and VTWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMIZVTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.15

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.48

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between SMIZ and VTWO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SMIZ vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison

SMIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VTWO's 1.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
0.61%0.62%1.57%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.25%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Drawdowns

SMIZ vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIZ drawdown since its inception was -25.04%, smaller than the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIZ and VTWO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMIZVTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.04%

-41.19%

+16.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-13.90%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.30%

-7.29%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-8.47%

+4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.74%

-0.66%

Volatility

SMIZ vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) have volatilities of 7.46% and 7.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMIZVTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

7.38%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

14.44%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.15%

23.29%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

22.49%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

23.04%

-4.02%