SMHX vs. HODL
SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) and HODL (VanEck Bitcoin Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SMHX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index, while HODL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMHX returned 139.42% vs -38.56% for HODL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMHX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HODL.
Performance
SMHX vs. HODL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMHX achieves a 78.44% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -25.27% return.
SMHX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 33.64%
- YTD
- 78.44%
- 6M
- 72.62%
- 1Y
- 139.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HODL
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -18.34%
- YTD
- -25.27%
- 6M
- -29.73%
- 1Y
- -38.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMHX vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 78.44% | 30.00% | 17.76% |
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust | -25.27% | -6.42% | 58.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHX and HODL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHX vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank
SMHX
HODL
SMHX vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHX | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 0.86 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.22 | -0.79 | +9.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.13 | -1.36 | +24.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHX | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30 | -0.89 | +5.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.94 | 0.30 | +1.64 |
Drawdowns
SMHX vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, smaller than the maximum HODL drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and HODL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHX | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.53% | -49.25% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.06% | -49.25% | +32.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -47.93% | +47.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -15.97% | +8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 28.35% | -22.30% |
Volatility
SMHX vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) at 9.43%. This indicates that SMHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHX | HODL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 9.43% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.06% | 34.37% | -9.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.69% | 43.51% | -10.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.97% | 49.88% | -9.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.97% | 49.88% | -9.91% |
SMHX vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHX vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison
SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMHX and HODL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMHX has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to HODL (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMHX dropped -38.53% vs HODL's -49.25%.
On 1-year performance, SMHX leads with 139.42% vs -38.56% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HODL has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMHX has performed better with a 139.42% return vs -38.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMHX.
SMHX has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.
SMHX is categorized as Semiconductors, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. SMHX tracks MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMHX and 0.25% for HODL.
SMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMHX and HODL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer