PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMHX vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMHX vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHX achieves a 78.44% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -25.27% return.


SMHX

1D
0.94%
1M
33.64%
YTD
78.44%
6M
72.62%
1Y
139.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HODL

1D
-2.79%
1M
-18.34%
YTD
-25.27%
6M
-29.73%
1Y
-38.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMHX vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
78.44%30.00%17.76%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-25.27%-6.42%58.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SMHX and HODL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMHX vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHX
SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHX vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHXHODLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

0.86

+0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.22

-0.79

+9.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.13

-1.36

+24.49

SMHX vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMHX Sharpe Ratio is 4.30, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMHX and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHXHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30

-0.89

+5.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.94

0.30

+1.64

Drawdowns

SMHX vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, smaller than the maximum HODL drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and HODL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHXHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.53%

-49.25%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.06%

-49.25%

+32.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-47.93%

+47.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-15.97%

+8.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

28.35%

-22.30%

Volatility

SMHX vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) at 9.43%. This indicates that SMHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHXHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.81%

9.43%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.06%

34.37%

-9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.69%

43.51%

-10.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.97%

49.88%

-9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.97%

49.88%

-9.91%

SMHX vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMHX vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
0.01%0.02%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMHX and HODL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMHX has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to HODL (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMHX dropped -38.53% vs HODL's -49.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMHX leads with 139.42% vs -38.56% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HODL has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMHX has performed better with a 139.42% return vs -38.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMHX.

SMHX has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

SMHX is categorized as Semiconductors, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. SMHX tracks MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMHX and 0.25% for HODL.

SMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMHX and HODL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer