HODL vs. WGMI
HODL (VanEck Bitcoin Trust) and WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. HODL is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. Over the past year, HODL returned -35.69% vs 315.76% for WGMI. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HODL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.
Performance
HODL vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HODL achieves a -23.13% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 86.86% return.
HODL
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -14.33%
- YTD
- -23.13%
- 6M
- -26.17%
- 1Y
- -35.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WGMI
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 48.39%
- YTD
- 86.86%
- 6M
- 63.71%
- 1Y
- 315.76%
- 3Y*
- 86.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HODL vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust | -23.13% | -6.42% | 99.75% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 86.86% | 72.47% | 41.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between HODL and WGMI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between HODL and WGMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HODL vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank
HODL
WGMI
HODL vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HODL | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | 4.19 | -5.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | 3.60 | -4.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.44 | -0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 6.56 | -7.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 13.32 | -14.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HODL | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 | 4.19 | -5.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.31 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
HODL vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HODL drawdown since its inception was -49.25%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HODL and WGMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HODL | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.25% | -85.76% | +36.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.25% | -50.94% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -62.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.44% | 0.00% | -46.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.92% | -42.94% | +27.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.19% | 25.08% | +3.11% |
Volatility
HODL vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) is 9.65%, while Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 20.11%. This indicates that HODL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HODL | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 20.11% | -10.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.73% | 55.70% | -20.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.43% | 76.10% | -32.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.89% | 81.57% | -31.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.89% | 81.57% | -31.68% |
HODL vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HODL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HODL vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison
Neither HODL nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HODL and WGMI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGMI has higher volatility (20.11%) compared to HODL (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HODL dropped -49.25% vs WGMI's -85.76%.
On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 315.76% vs -35.69% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HODL has been the lower-risk option at 9.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 315.76% return vs -35.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.
HODL and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Valkyrie. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HODL and 0.75% for WGMI.
WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.19 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HODL and WGMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer