SMHX vs. CHPX
SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) and CHPX (Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - SMHX tracks the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index while CHPX tracks the Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMHX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CHPX.
Performance
SMHX vs. CHPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMHX achieves a 76.78% return, which is significantly lower than CHPX's 99.74% return.
SMHX
- 1D
- 5.94%
- 1M
- 31.13%
- YTD
- 76.78%
- 6M
- 74.71%
- 1Y
- 143.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPX
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- 35.81%
- YTD
- 99.74%
- 6M
- 96.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMHX vs. CHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 76.78% | -1.04% |
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 99.74% | 5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHX and CHPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHX vs. CHPX — Risk / Return Rank
SMHX
CHPX
SMHX vs. CHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHX | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.40 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.57 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.64 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHX | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.92 | 5.44 | -3.51 |
Drawdowns
SMHX vs. CHPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, which is greater than CHPX's maximum drawdown of -15.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and CHPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHX | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.53% | -15.15% | -23.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -3.80% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | — | — |
Volatility
SMHX vs. CHPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHX | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.72% | 38.40% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.01% | 38.40% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.01% | 38.40% | +1.61% |
SMHX vs. CHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHX vs. CHPX - Dividend Comparison
SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than CHPX's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SMHX and CHPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SMHX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMHX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CHPX.
CHPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.01% for SMHX.
SMHX tracks MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index, while CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMHX and 0.50% for CHPX.
Find the right allocation for SMHX and CHPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer