SMHX vs. CHPX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX).

SMHX and CHPX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMHX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Aug 27, 2024. CHPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index. It was launched on Sep 30, 2025. Both SMHX and CHPX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SMHX vs. CHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMHX vs. CHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	-2.14%	-1.04%
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF	5.14%	5.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHX achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than CHPX's 5.14% return.

SMHX

• 1D: 6.30%
• 1M: -3.11%
• YTD: -2.14%
• 6M: -2.75%
• 1Y: 59.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPX

• 1D: 5.81%
• 1M: -7.36%
• YTD: 5.14%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMHX vs. CHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPX's 0.50% expense ratio.

CHPX

Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF

SMHX

VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF

Return for Risk

SMHX vs. CHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHX

SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 85
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHX vs. CHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMHX	CHPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMHX	CHPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.66	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between SMHX and CHPX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SMHX vs. CHPX - Dividend Comparison

SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than CHPX's 0.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.04%
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SMHX vs. CHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, which is greater than CHPX's maximum drawdown of -15.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and CHPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMHX	CHPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.53%	-15.15%	-23.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.83%	-10.22%	-1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-4.58%	-3.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMHX	CHPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.72%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.38%	35.73%	+3.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.83%	35.73%	+4.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.83%	35.73%	+4.10%