SMHX vs. FSELX
SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) and FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) are both Semiconductors funds. Over the past year, SMHX returned 143.03% vs 157.66% for FSELX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMHX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FSELX.
Performance
SMHX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMHX having a 76.78% return and FSELX slightly lower at 74.49%.
SMHX
- 1D
- 5.94%
- 1M
- 31.13%
- YTD
- 76.78%
- 6M
- 74.71%
- 1Y
- 143.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSELX
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 18.98%
- YTD
- 74.49%
- 6M
- 75.66%
- 1Y
- 157.66%
- 3Y*
- 65.42%
- 5Y*
- 44.76%
- 10Y*
- 38.36%
SMHX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 76.78% | 30.00% | 17.76% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 74.49% | 52.17% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHX and FSELX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SMHX and FSELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank
SMHX
FSELX
SMHX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.40 | 5.05 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.57 | 4.99 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.68 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.64 | 10.79 | -2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.36 | 41.52 | -17.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40 | 5.05 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.92 | 0.54 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
SMHX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and FSELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.53% | -82.54% | +44.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.06% | -14.38% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -28.70% | +21.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 3.74% | +2.31% |
Volatility
SMHX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) at 10.80%. This indicates that SMHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 10.80% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.06% | 24.78% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.72% | 32.26% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.01% | 38.87% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.01% | 35.01% | +5.00% |
SMHX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison
SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FSELX's 9.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 9.39% | 11.11% | 7.97% | 7.20% | 6.69% | 6.99% | 8.13% | 3.36% | 26.80% | 14.44% | 3.82% | 15.22% |
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SMHX and FSELX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SMHX has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to FSELX (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMHX dropped -38.53% vs FSELX's -82.54%.
FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 4.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMHX and FSELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer