SMHX vs. SOXQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - SMHX tracks the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index while SOXQ tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMHX returned 64.03% vs 105.49% for SOXQ. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SMHX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.

Performance

SMHX vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHX achieves a 44.20% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 59.97% return.

SMHX

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -6.50%
• 6M: 40.29%
• YTD: 44.20%
• 1Y: 64.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 49.51%

SOXQ

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -10.31%
• 6M: 41.59%
• YTD: 59.97%
• 1Y: 105.49%
• 3Y*: 44.02%
• 5Y*: 28.65%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	$4.68M	$6.01M	$8.35M
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF	$219.33M	$233.61M	$278.30M

SMHX vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	44.20%	30.00%	15.56%
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF	59.97%	43.11%	-3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SMHX and SOXQ is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2024	0.94

The correlation between SMHX and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMHX vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMHX	SOXQ
Technology	100.0%	99.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMHX vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMHX

SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 65
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SOXQ

SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 88
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMHX vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMHX	SOXQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.37	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.71	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.36	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	3.61	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.67	15.05	-7.38

SMHX vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMHX and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMHX vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and SOXQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMHX	SOXQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.53%	-46.01%	+7.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.93%	-28.56%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.19%	-22.64%	+3.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.72%	-12.92%	+5.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.99%	6.83%	+1.16%

Volatility

SMHX vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) is 14.74%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 17.19%. This indicates that SMHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMHX	SOXQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.74%	17.19%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.37%	37.70%	-4.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.65%	43.52%	-3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.00%	38.28%	+3.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.00%	37.93%	+4.07%

SMHX vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMHX vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SOXQ's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF	0.32%	0.50%	0.68%	0.87%	1.36%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMHX and SOXQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SMHX and SOXQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SMHX or SOXQ?

SOXQ has higher volatility (17.19%) compared to SMHX (14.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMHX dropped -38.53% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

Which ETF is better, SMHX or SOXQ?

On 1-year performance, SOXQ leads with 105.49% vs 64.03% for SMHX. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SMHX has been the lower-risk option at 14.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMHX or SOXQ?

Over the 1-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 105.49% return vs 64.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMHX or SOXQ?

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMHX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMHX or SOXQ?

SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.02% for SMHX.

What is the main difference between SMHX and SOXQ?

SMHX tracks MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMHX and 0.19% for SOXQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.