PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. VTWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 20.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYV having a 10.61% annualized return and VTWV not far ahead at 10.87%.


SLYV

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.91%
YTD
17.46%
6M
15.89%
1Y
37.37%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.61%

VTWV

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.41%
YTD
20.87%
6M
18.73%
1Y
42.70%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
17.46%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
20.87%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and VTWV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.93

The correlation between SLYV and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYV
VTWV

Financial Services

19.5%
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
8.9%

Technology

13.4%
11.6%

Industrials

11.6%
12.2%

Real Estate

8.6%
10.2%

Healthcare

7.3%
10.1%

Energy

7.0%
7.8%

Basic Materials

6.9%
5.4%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
2.1%

Utilities

2.1%
5.0%

Financial Services

SLYV
19.5%
VTWV
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
15.4%
VTWV
8.9%

Technology

SLYV
13.4%
VTWV
11.6%

Industrials

SLYV
11.6%
VTWV
12.2%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.6%
VTWV
10.2%

Healthcare

SLYV
7.3%
VTWV
10.1%

Energy

SLYV
7.0%
VTWV
7.8%

Basic Materials

SLYV
6.9%
VTWV
5.4%

Communication Services

SLYV
4.4%
VTWV
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
3.8%
VTWV
2.1%

Utilities

SLYV
2.1%
VTWV
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYVVTWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

4.97

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

16.97

-3.67

SLYV vs. VTWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the VTWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and VTWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than VTWV's maximum drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and VTWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVVTWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-45.73%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.64%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-26.72%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-26.72%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-45.73%

-2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.30%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-7.79%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.52%

+0.30%

Volatility

SLYV vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.76%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVVTWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

5.34%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

12.61%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

18.42%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

21.71%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.94%

23.54%

+0.40%

SLYV vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYV vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than VTWV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.87%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.63%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SLYV and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to SLYV (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs VTWV's -45.73%.

On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 10.87% vs 10.61% for SLYV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.63% for VTWV.

SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.10% for VTWV.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and VTWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer