SLON vs. FLTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.

Performance

SLON vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.91% return.

SLON

• 1D: -9.37%
• 1M: -30.10%
• YTD: -74.41%
• 6M: -81.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 6.10%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	-74.41%	-62.58%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.91%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and FLTR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

SLON vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLON	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.63	0.53	-1.16

Drawdowns

SLON vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLON	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.19%	-17.84%	-77.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.19%	-0.04%	-95.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.84%	-0.67%	-63.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLON	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	146.78%	0.79%	+145.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	146.78%	2.13%	+144.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	146.78%	5.00%	+141.78%

SLON vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLON vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than FLTR's 4.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.73%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	22.44%	5.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLON and FLTR in my portfolio?

SLON and FLTR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLON or FLTR?

On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLON or FLTR?

FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLON or FLTR?

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 4.73% for FLTR.

What is the main difference between SLON and FLTR?

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.14% for FLTR.