SLON vs. AGZD
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. Both are passively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
SLON vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -77.64% return, which is significantly lower than AGZD's 2.29% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -11.08%
- 1M
- -37.46%
- YTD
- -77.64%
- 6M
- -77.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
SLON vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -77.64% | -62.89% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 2.29% | 2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and AGZD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AGZD
SLON vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLON | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLON vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.31% | -8.46% | -87.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.80% | -0.56% | -95.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -0.77% | -64.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.14% | 2.84% | +145.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 3.60% | +144.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 3.72% | +144.42% |
SLON vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.68%, more than AGZD's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.99% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 25.68% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and AGZD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 25.68%, compared with 3.99% for AGZD.
SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while AGZD tracks Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.23% for AGZD.
Find the right allocation for SLON and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer