SLON vs. SQQQ
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
SLON vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than SQQQ's -45.27% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -9.37%
- 1M
- -30.10%
- YTD
- -74.41%
- 6M
- -81.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQQQ
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -26.37%
- YTD
- -45.27%
- 6M
- -42.79%
- 1Y
- -65.16%
- 3Y*
- -56.19%
- 5Y*
- -49.17%
- 10Y*
- -56.01%
SLON vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -74.41% | -62.58% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -45.27% | -25.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and SQQQ is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | -0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
SQQQ
SLON vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLON | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -0.88 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
SLON vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.19% | -100.00% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -65.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -92.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.19% | -100.00% | +4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.84% | -92.40% | +28.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 35.73% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.78% | 47.79% | +98.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 66.64% | +80.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 66.11% | +80.67% |
SLON vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than SQQQ's 12.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 22.44% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 12.48% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 12.48% for SQQQ.
SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.95% for SQQQ.
Find the right allocation for SLON and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer