SLON vs. SQQQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLON returned -90.71% vs -52.32% for SQQQ. Their -0.45 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.

Performance

SLON vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -75.40% return, which is significantly lower than SQQQ's -34.61% return.

SLON

• 1D: -3.99%
• 1M: -18.94%
• 6M: -70.99%
• YTD: -75.40%
• 1Y: -90.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -89.92%

SQQQ

• 1D: -1.99%
• 1M: 9.46%
• 6M: -32.40%
• YTD: -34.61%
• 1Y: -52.32%
• 3Y*: -49.83%
• 5Y*: -44.46%
• 10Y*: -54.48%
• ALL TIME*: -52.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	$682.69K	$868.60K	$1.20M
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	$2.40B	$2.29B	$2.66B

SLON vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	-75.40%	-62.89%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	-34.61%	-25.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and SQQQ is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	-0.45

Return for Risk

SLON vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLON

SLON Risk / Return Rank: 3
SLON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SLON Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SLON Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SLON Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SLON Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SQQQ

SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLON vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLON	SQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	-0.86	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.36	-1.25	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.86	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	-0.81	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	-1.41	+0.22

SLON vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLON Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLON and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLON vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and SQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLON	SQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.31%	-100.00%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.31%	-61.03%	-35.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-92.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.27%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.38%	-100.00%	+4.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.35%	-92.78%	+24.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	77.06%	35.08%	+41.98%

Volatility

SLON vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) has a higher volatility of 23.28% compared to ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) at 20.82%. This indicates that SLON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLON	SQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.28%	20.82%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	100.99%	48.09%	+52.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	144.72%	57.98%	+86.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	144.74%	68.18%	+76.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.74%	66.74%	+78.00%

SLON vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLON vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.34%, more than SQQQ's 9.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	23.34%	5.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	9.14%	9.36%	10.23%	8.01%	0.28%	0.00%	2.15%	2.92%	1.47%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLON and SQQQ in my portfolio?

SLON and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLON or SQQQ?

SLON has higher volatility (23.28%) compared to SQQQ (20.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLON dropped -96.31% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

Which ETF is better, SLON or SQQQ?

On 1-year performance, SQQQ leads with -52.32% vs -90.71% for SLON. On fees, SQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 20.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLON or SQQQ?

Over the 1-year period, SQQQ has performed better with a -52.32% return vs -90.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLON or SQQQ?

SQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLON or SQQQ?

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 23.34%, compared with 9.14% for SQQQ.

What is the main difference between SLON and SQQQ?

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.95% for SQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.