SLB vs. V
SLB (Schlumberger Limited) and V (Visa Inc.) are both stocks. SLB operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while V operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, SLB returned 0.01%/yr vs 15.41%/yr for V. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLB vs. V - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a 49.78% return, which is significantly higher than V's -10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SLB has underperformed V with an annualized return of 0.01%, while V has yielded a comparatively higher 15.41% annualized return.
SLB
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 49.78%
- 6M
- 53.09%
- 1Y
- 72.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 0.01%
V
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -10.55%
- 6M
- -4.83%
- 1Y
- -13.94%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
SLB vs. V - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 49.78% | 3.27% | -24.47% | -0.78% | 81.15% | 40.30% | -43.81% | 17.73% | -44.66% | -17.37% |
V Visa Inc. | -10.55% | 11.76% | 22.32% | 26.31% | -3.40% | -0.31% | 17.12% | 43.33% | 16.49% | 47.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLB and V is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2008 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SLB and V has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
SLB:
$3.04
V:
$15.24
SLB:
18.67
V:
20.50
SLB:
0.88
V:
1.26
SLB:
1.72
V:
10.59
SLB:
$35.94B
V:
$43.03B
SLB:
$4.90B
V:
$16.94B
SLB:
$5.30B
V:
$27.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLB vs. V — Risk / Return Rank
SLB
V
SLB vs. V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Visa Inc. (V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLB | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.90 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | -0.69 | +5.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | -1.28 | +14.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLB | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | -0.63 | +2.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | 0.63 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.68 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
SLB vs. V - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.64%, which is greater than V's maximum drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and V.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLB | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.64% | -51.90% | -35.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -20.38% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.63% | -20.38% | -26.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.63% | -28.60% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.29% | -36.36% | -47.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.73% | -15.66% | -17.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.18% | -8.26% | -22.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 10.94% | -5.30% |
Volatility
SLB vs. V - Volatility Comparison
Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Visa Inc. (V) at 5.20%. This indicates that SLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLB | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 5.20% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.39% | 17.26% | +8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.46% | 22.11% | +11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.55% | 22.77% | +14.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.40% | 24.45% | +15.95% |
Dividends
SLB vs. V - Dividend Comparison
SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than V's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.54% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
V Visa Inc. | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.72% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.56% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.64% |
Financials
SLB vs. V - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schlumberger Limited and Visa Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLB vs. V - Profitability Comparison
SLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
V - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a gross profit of -8.90B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -79.3%.
SLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
V - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported an operating income of 7.23B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 64.4%.
SLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
V - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a net income of 6.02B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 53.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLB and V have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLB has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to V (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLB dropped -87.64% vs V's -51.90%.
SLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLB and V
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer