SLB vs. CL=F

In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly higher than CL=F's -18.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SLB has underperformed CL=F with an annualized return of -6.73%, while CL=F has yielded a comparatively higher -0.30% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Crude Oil WTI (CL=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SLB Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is comparable to the CL=F Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLB and CL=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.63%, smaller than the maximum CL=F drawdown of -93.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and CL=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a higher volatility of 23.30% compared to Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) at 14.66%. This indicates that SLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.