SLB vs. HAL

In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a -13.75% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's -10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SLB has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of -5.15%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher -2.64% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SLB Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is comparable to the HAL Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLB and HAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than HAL's 2.10% yield.

The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.63%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and HAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Halliburton Company (HAL) have volatilities of 9.61% and 9.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schlumberger Limited and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.