SLB vs. HAL
Compare and contrast key facts about Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Halliburton Company (HAL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLB or HAL.
Correlation
The correlation between SLB and HAL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SLB vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SLB:
-1.02
HAL:
-1.27
SLB:
-1.44
HAL:
-1.95
SLB:
0.81
HAL:
0.75
SLB:
-0.56
HAL:
-0.70
SLB:
-1.81
HAL:
-1.76
SLB:
19.73%
HAL:
26.95%
SLB:
34.90%
HAL:
37.52%
SLB:
-87.63%
HAL:
-92.99%
SLB:
-61.38%
HAL:
-65.38%
Fundamentals
SLB:
$46.18B
HAL:
$18.16B
SLB:
$3.11
HAL:
$2.83
SLB:
10.92
HAL:
7.45
SLB:
3.02
HAL:
15.78
SLB:
$27.59B
HAL:
$17.14B
SLB:
$5.80B
HAL:
$3.22B
SLB:
$5.92B
HAL:
$3.63B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a -10.81% return, which is significantly higher than HAL's -21.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SLB has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of -6.94%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher -6.25% annualized return.
SLB
-10.81%
-14.95%
-23.15%
-32.96%
18.78%
-6.94%
HAL
-21.96%
-13.43%
-30.78%
-45.64%
23.79%
-6.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLB vs. HAL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SLB
HAL
SLB vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLB vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than HAL's 3.23% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 3.27% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 1.67% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% | 1.87% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 3.23% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% | 1.60% |
Drawdowns
SLB vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.63%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and HAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLB vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) is 22.89%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 25.61%. This indicates that SLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SLB vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schlumberger Limited and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities