SLB vs. HAL
SLB (SLB N.V.) and HAL (Halliburton Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, SLB returned -1.76%/yr vs -0.72%/yr for HAL. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SLB vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a 30.65% return, which is significantly higher than HAL's 15.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SLB has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of -1.76%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher -0.72% annualized return.
SLB
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 30.65%
- 1Y
- 54.14%
- 3Y*
- -2.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.93%
- 10Y*
- -1.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.69%
HAL
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- 15.16%
- 1Y
- 52.77%
- 3Y*
- -4.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- -0.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $496.27M | $402.82M | $436.82M | |
SLB SLB N.V. | $764.53M | $619.10M | $729.53M |
SLB vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLB SLB N.V. | 30.65% | 3.27% | -24.47% | -0.78% | 81.15% | 40.30% | -43.81% | 17.73% | -44.66% | -17.37% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 15.16% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLB and HAL is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1981 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SLB and HAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SLB:
$74.14B
HAL:
$26.94B
SLB:
$1.37
HAL:
$1.90
SLB:
36.18
HAL:
16.95
SLB:
1.70
HAL:
2.70
SLB:
2.98
HAL:
1.21
SLB:
$18.67B
HAL:
$22.37B
SLB:
$3.29B
HAL:
$3.58B
SLB:
$3.30B
HAL:
$3.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLB vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank
SLB
HAL
SLB vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLB N.V. (SLB) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLB | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.75 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | 5.65 | +1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLB vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.64%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and HAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLB | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.64% | -92.99% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.27% | -27.12% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.63% | -54.01% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.63% | -54.01% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.29% | -91.45% | +7.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.32% | -45.34% | +4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -39.13% | +7.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 8.49% | -0.85% |
Volatility
SLB vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
SLB N.V. (SLB) has a higher volatility of 12.26% compared to Halliburton Company (HAL) at 10.00%. This indicates that SLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLB | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.26% | 10.00% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.48% | 23.49% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.98% | 35.71% | -0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.67% | 39.87% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.64% | 45.96% | -5.32% |
Dividends
SLB vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than HAL's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 2.11% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
SLB SLB N.V. | 2.34% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Financials
SLB vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SLB N.V. and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLB vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison
SLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SLB N.V. reported a gross profit of -1.33B and revenue of -8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.3%.
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 1.00B and revenue of 5.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.5%.
SLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SLB N.V. reported an operating income of -1.03B and revenue of -8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 778.00M and revenue of 5.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.
SLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SLB N.V. reported a net income of -752.00M and revenue of -8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 5.71B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLB and HAL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLB has higher volatility (12.26%) compared to HAL (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLB dropped -87.64% vs HAL's -92.99%.
SLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLB and HAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer