PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SLB vs. HAL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SLB and HAL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

SLB vs. HAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Halliburton Company (HAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
720.76%
493.93%
SLB
HAL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SLB:

-1.06

HAL:

-0.99

Sortino Ratio

SLB:

-1.44

HAL:

-1.33

Omega Ratio

SLB:

0.83

HAL:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

SLB:

-0.48

HAL:

-0.47

Martin Ratio

SLB:

-1.71

HAL:

-1.43

Ulcer Index

SLB:

16.43%

HAL:

19.04%

Daily Std Dev

SLB:

26.65%

HAL:

27.61%

Max Drawdown

SLB:

-87.63%

HAL:

-92.99%

Current Drawdown

SLB:

-58.41%

HAL:

-57.63%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLB:

$56.32B

HAL:

$23.89B

EPS

SLB:

$3.11

HAL:

$2.86

PE Ratio

SLB:

12.82

HAL:

9.51

PEG Ratio

SLB:

1.79

HAL:

1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLB:

$36.01B

HAL:

$23.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLB:

$7.22B

HAL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

SLB:

$7.79B

HAL:

$4.80B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLB having a -27.44% return and HAL slightly higher at -26.64%. Over the past 10 years, SLB has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of -5.67%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher -2.44% annualized return.


SLB

YTD

-27.44%

1M

-15.88%

6M

-18.30%

1Y

-28.87%

5Y*

0.16%

10Y*

-5.67%

HAL

YTD

-26.64%

1M

-16.71%

6M

-21.94%

1Y

-27.62%

5Y*

2.83%

10Y*

-2.44%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLB vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLB, currently valued at -1.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-1.06-0.99
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLB, currently valued at -1.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.44-1.33
The chart of Omega ratio for SLB, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.830.84
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLB, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.48-0.47
The chart of Martin ratio for SLB, currently valued at -1.71, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-1.71-1.43
SLB
HAL

The current SLB Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is comparable to the HAL Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLB and HAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.06
-0.99
SLB
HAL

Dividends

SLB vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison

SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than HAL's 2.62% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SLB
Schlumberger Limited
2.99%1.92%1.22%1.67%4.01%4.98%5.54%2.97%2.38%2.87%1.87%1.39%
HAL
Halliburton Company
2.62%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%1.60%1.03%

Drawdowns

SLB vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.63%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and HAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-58.41%
-57.63%
SLB
HAL

Volatility

SLB vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) is 6.36%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that SLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.36%
7.94%
SLB
HAL

Financials

SLB vs. HAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schlumberger Limited and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab