SLB vs. BKR
Compare and contrast key facts about Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Baker Hughes Company (BKR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLB or BKR.
Performance
SLB vs. BKR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a -14.79% return, which is significantly lower than BKR's 32.99% return.
SLB
-14.79%
2.59%
-5.13%
-15.48%
6.01%
-5.20%
BKR
32.99%
22.24%
39.70%
34.05%
18.12%
N/A
Fundamentals
SLB | BKR | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $60.86B | $43.85B |
EPS | $3.11 | $2.23 |
PE Ratio | 13.86 | 19.87 |
PEG Ratio | 1.94 | 0.99 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $36.01B | $27.30B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $7.22B | $5.76B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $7.79B | $4.30B |
Key characteristics
SLB | BKR | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | -0.58 | 1.26 |
Sortino Ratio | -0.67 | 1.96 |
Omega Ratio | 0.92 | 1.24 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.28 | 1.48 |
Martin Ratio | -1.04 | 4.43 |
Ulcer Index | 14.94% | 7.73% |
Daily Std Dev | 26.98% | 27.18% |
Max Drawdown | -87.63% | -73.51% |
Current Drawdown | -51.15% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between SLB and BKR is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLB vs. BKR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Baker Hughes Company (BKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLB vs. BKR - Dividend Comparison
SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than BKR's 1.90% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schlumberger Limited | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 1.67% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% | 1.87% | 1.39% |
Baker Hughes Company | 1.90% | 2.28% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 3.45% | 2.81% | 3.35% | 56.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SLB vs. BKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.63%, which is greater than BKR's maximum drawdown of -73.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and BKR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLB vs. BKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) is 9.56%, while Baker Hughes Company (BKR) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that SLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SLB vs. BKR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schlumberger Limited and Baker Hughes Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities