SHPP vs. POW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SHPP (Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHPP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. SHPP is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHPP charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

SHPP vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.

SHPP

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: 2.17%
• 6M: 15.11%
• YTD: 19.13%
• 1Y: 25.38%
• 3Y*: 11.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -13.79%
• 6M: 25.01%
• YTD: 35.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHPP vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF	19.13%	2.94%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	35.68%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SHPP and POW is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

SHPP vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHPP

SHPP Risk / Return Rank: 60
SHPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SHPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SHPP Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SHPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SHPP Martin Ratio Rank: 60

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHPP vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHPP	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.39	—	—

Drawdowns

SHPP vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHPP	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.57%	-20.28%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-20.28%	+20.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-4.56%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SHPP	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.44%	33.06%	-17.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	33.06%	-15.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.39%	33.06%	-15.67%

SHPP vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHPP vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF	1.67%	1.80%	2.41%	2.89%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHPP and POW in my portfolio?

SHPP and POW have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SHPP or POW?

On fees, SHPP is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHPP or POW?

SHPP is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHPP or POW?

SHPP has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between SHPP and POW?

SHPP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SHPP and 0.75% for POW.