PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SENEA vs. GIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

SENEA vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SENEA vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SENEA
Seneca Foods Corporation
41.54%39.58%51.14%-13.96%27.11%20.18%-2.18%44.54%-8.23%-23.22%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
-18.85%-23.75%1.45%-19.97%28.09%18.53%13.60%43.13%-31.57%-0.65%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SENEA:

$1.08B

GIS:

$20.19B

EPS

SENEA:

$12.99

GIS:

$4.07

PE Ratio

SENEA:

12.05

GIS:

9.15

PEG Ratio

SENEA:

0.11

GIS:

3.94

PS Ratio

SENEA:

0.67

GIS:

1.10

PB Ratio

SENEA:

1.52

GIS:

2.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

SENEA:

$1.61B

GIS:

$18.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SENEA:

$202.67M

GIS:

$4.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

SENEA:

$170.76M

GIS:

$3.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SENEA achieves a 41.54% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -18.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SENEA has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 16.26%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -1.98% annualized return.


SENEA

1D
3.62%
1M
15.90%
YTD
41.54%
6M
43.31%
1Y
74.09%
3Y*
44.16%
5Y*
26.85%
10Y*
16.26%

GIS

1D
-0.03%
1M
-17.53%
YTD
-18.85%
6M
-24.64%
1Y
-34.57%
3Y*
-21.17%
5Y*
-6.10%
10Y*
-1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SENEA vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SENEA
SENEA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SENEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENEA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SENEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENEA Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
GIS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENEA vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SENEAGISDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

-1.46

+4.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

-2.13

+5.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.75

+0.64

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

-0.91

+5.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.10

-1.84

+13.94

SENEA vs. GIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SENEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SENEA and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SENEAGISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

-1.46

+4.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

-0.29

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

-0.09

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.43

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between SENEA and GIS is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SENEA vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

SENEA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SENEA
Seneca Foods Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
6.53%5.20%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%

Drawdowns

SENEA vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENEA drawdown since its inception was -79.33%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -55.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENEA and GIS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SENEAGISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.33%

-55.55%

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-37.97%

+20.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.29%

-55.55%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.29%

-55.55%

+4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-54.09%

+54.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.13%

-10.07%

-31.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.27%

18.79%

-12.52%

Volatility

SENEA vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 7.37%. This indicates that SENEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SENEAGISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

7.37%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.49%

18.28%

+4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.13%

23.76%

+5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.41%

20.89%

+13.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.40%

21.97%

+18.43%

Financials

SENEA vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seneca Foods Corporation and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
508.35M
4.44B
(SENEA) Total Revenue
(GIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SENEA vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Seneca Foods Corporation and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
16.4%
0
Portfolio components
SENEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 83.46M and revenue of 508.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SENEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 59.97M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

SENEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 44.77M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.