SENEA vs. GIS
SENEA (Seneca Foods Corporation) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, SENEA returned 16.17%/yr vs -3.11%/yr for GIS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SENEA vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SENEA achieves a 28.02% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -28.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SENEA has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 16.17%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -3.11% annualized return.
SENEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 28.02%
- 6M
- 19.76%
- 1Y
- 51.04%
- 3Y*
- 43.67%
- 5Y*
- 23.95%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
GIS
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -28.66%
- 6M
- -28.20%
- 1Y
- -37.41%
- 3Y*
- -24.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.55%
- 10Y*
- -3.11%
SENEA vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SENEA Seneca Foods Corporation | 28.02% | 39.58% | 51.14% | -13.96% | 27.11% | 20.18% | -2.18% | 44.54% | -8.23% | -23.22% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -28.66% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SENEA and GIS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 1998 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
SENEA:
$977.81M
GIS:
$17.45B
SENEA:
$12.99
GIS:
$4.08
SENEA:
10.90
GIS:
7.88
SENEA:
0.10
GIS:
3.39
SENEA:
0.61
GIS:
0.95
SENEA:
1.37
GIS:
1.87
SENEA:
$1.61B
GIS:
$18.37B
SENEA:
$202.67M
GIS:
$4.70B
SENEA:
$170.76M
GIS:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SENEA vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
SENEA
GIS
SENEA vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SENEA | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | -1.59 | +3.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | -2.35 | +4.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.73 | +0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | -0.99 | +3.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.96 | -2.06 | +8.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SENEA | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | -1.59 | +3.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | -0.45 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | -0.14 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.42 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
SENEA vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SENEA drawdown since its inception was -79.33%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENEA and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SENEA | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.33% | -59.63% | -19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.04% | -37.97% | +16.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.03% | -57.09% | +23.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.29% | -59.63% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.29% | -59.63% | +8.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.35% | -59.63% | +44.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.96% | -10.25% | -30.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.59% | 18.20% | -9.61% |
Volatility
SENEA vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.78%. This indicates that SENEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SENEA | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 6.78% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.96% | 18.45% | +8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.16% | 23.60% | +10.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.41% | 21.09% | +14.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.56% | 22.08% | +18.48% |
Dividends
SENEA vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
SENEA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.58% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
SENEA Seneca Foods Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SENEA vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seneca Foods Corporation and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SENEA vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
SENEA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 83.46M and revenue of 508.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SENEA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 59.97M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
SENEA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 44.77M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SENEA and GIS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SENEA has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to GIS (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENEA dropped -79.33% vs GIS's -59.63%.
SENEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SENEA and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer