PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SENEA vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SENEA vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SENEA achieves a 52.00% return, which is significantly higher than ANET's 26.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SENEA has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 17.00%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 45.81% annualized return.


SENEA

1D
1.01%
1M
16.44%
YTD
52.00%
6M
51.77%
1Y
76.84%
3Y*
63.69%
5Y*
27.45%
10Y*
17.00%

ANET

1D
2.29%
1M
4.71%
YTD
26.27%
6M
26.52%
1Y
71.79%
3Y*
63.72%
5Y*
48.85%
10Y*
45.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENEA vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SENEA
Seneca Foods Corporation
52.00%39.58%51.14%-13.96%27.11%20.18%-2.18%44.54%-8.23%-23.22%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
26.27%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SENEA and ANET is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.13

The correlation between SENEA and ANET shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SENEA:

$1.15B

ANET:

$210.75B

EPS

SENEA:

$16.62

ANET:

$2.92

PE Ratio

SENEA:

10.12

ANET:

56.67

PEG Ratio

SENEA:

0.06

ANET:

1.33

PS Ratio

SENEA:

0.70

ANET:

21.71

PB Ratio

SENEA:

1.52

ANET:

15.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

SENEA:

$1.66B

ANET:

$9.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SENEA:

$231.21M

ANET:

$6.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

SENEA:

$199.00M

ANET:

$4.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SENEA vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SENEA
SENEA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SENEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENEA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SENEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENEA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENEA vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SENEAANETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

2.55

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

5.29

+3.37

SENEA vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SENEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SENEA and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SENEA vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENEA drawdown since its inception was -79.33%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENEA and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SENEAANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.33%

-52.20%

-27.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.04%

-28.33%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.83%

-50.42%

+27.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.29%

-50.42%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.29%

-52.20%

+0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.11%

-6.91%

+2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.89%

-15.37%

-25.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.91%

13.62%

-4.71%

Volatility

SENEA vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) has a higher volatility of 19.60% compared to Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) at 16.90%. This indicates that SENEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SENEAANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.60%

16.90%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.33%

40.71%

-8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.87%

53.17%

-14.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.20%

47.43%

-11.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.99%

44.98%

-3.99%

Dividends

SENEA vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

Neither SENEA nor ANET has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SENEA vs. ANET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seneca Foods Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
393.85M
2.71B
(SENEA) Total Revenue
(ANET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SENEA vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Seneca Foods Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
11.2%
61.9%
Portfolio components
SENEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 44.08M and revenue of 393.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

SENEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 23.74M and revenue of 393.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

SENEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 25.28M and revenue of 393.85M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SENEA and ANET have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SENEA has higher volatility (19.60%) compared to ANET (16.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENEA dropped -79.33% vs ANET's -52.20%.

SENEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SENEA and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer