PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SENEA vs. SENEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SENEA vs. SENEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) and Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SENEA achieves a 53.43% return, which is significantly lower than SENEB's 60.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SENEA having a 15.55% annualized return and SENEB not far ahead at 15.79%.


SENEA

1D
1.49%
1M
2.66%
6M
42.38%
YTD
53.43%
1Y
65.84%
3Y*
66.63%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
15.55%

SENEB

1D
0.00%
1M
9.43%
6M
47.16%
YTD
60.80%
1Y
70.21%
3Y*
67.51%
5Y*
27.39%
10Y*
15.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENEA vs. SENEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SENEA
Seneca Foods Corporation
53.43%39.58%51.14%-13.96%27.11%20.18%-2.18%44.54%-8.23%-23.22%
SENEB
Seneca Foods Corporation
60.80%37.97%53.72%-14.65%28.51%19.24%-3.66%39.12%-13.32%-19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SENEA and SENEB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 1998

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SENEA:

$1.16B

SENEB:

$1.08B

EPS

SENEA:

$16.65

SENEB:

$16.65

PE Ratio

SENEA:

10.19

SENEB:

10.58

PEG Ratio

SENEA:

0.06

SENEB:

0.06

PS Ratio

SENEA:

0.70

SENEB:

0.73

PB Ratio

SENEA:

1.53

SENEB:

1.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

SENEA:

$1.66B

SENEB:

$1.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SENEA:

$231.21M

SENEB:

$231.21M

EBITDA (TTM)

SENEA:

$199.00M

SENEB:

$199.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SENEA vs. SENEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SENEA
SENEA Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SENEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENEA Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SENEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENEA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SENEB
SENEB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SENEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SENEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENEA vs. SENEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) and Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SENEASENEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.81

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.47

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.42

9.39

-1.97

SENEA vs. SENEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SENEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SENEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SENEA and SENEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SENEA vs. SENEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENEA drawdown since its inception was -79.33%, which is greater than SENEB's maximum drawdown of -53.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENEA and SENEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SENEASENEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.33%

-53.42%

-25.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.04%

-20.32%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.83%

-22.41%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.29%

-53.42%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.29%

-53.42%

+2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.74%

-2.93%

-4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-21.98%

-18.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.90%

7.50%

+1.40%

Volatility

SENEA vs. SENEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is 10.84%, while Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that SENEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SENEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SENEASENEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

14.15%

-3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.01%

32.38%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.84%

37.87%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.09%

37.00%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.00%

40.13%

+0.87%

Dividends

SENEA vs. SENEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither SENEA nor SENEB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SENEA vs. SENEB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seneca Foods Corporation and Seneca Foods Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00M500.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
393.85M
393.85M
(SENEA) Total Revenue
(SENEB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SENEA vs. SENEB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Seneca Foods Corporation and Seneca Foods Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
11.2%
11.2%
Portfolio components
SENEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 44.08M and revenue of 393.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.

SENEB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 44.08M and revenue of 393.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.

SENEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 23.74M and revenue of 393.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

SENEB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 23.74M and revenue of 393.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

SENEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 25.28M and revenue of 393.85M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

SENEB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 25.28M and revenue of 393.85M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SENEA and SENEB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SENEB has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to SENEA (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENEA dropped -79.33% vs SENEB's -53.42%.

SENEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SENEA and SENEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer