SEMGX vs. ZIM
SEMGX (DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by DWS, while ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SEMGX returned 5.42%/yr vs 21.60%/yr for ZIM. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SEMGX vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMGX achieves a 33.58% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 23.92% return.
SEMGX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 33.58%
- 6M
- 37.12%
- 1Y
- 58.62%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
ZIM
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- 23.92%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 62.23%
- 3Y*
- 47.58%
- 5Y*
- 21.60%
- 10Y*
- —
SEMGX vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMGX DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 33.58% | 28.85% | 7.48% | 6.32% | -21.66% | -16.00% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 23.92% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMGX and ZIM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEMGX vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank
SEMGX
ZIM
SEMGX vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEMGX | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.26 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 2.04 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.10 | 4.93 | +10.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEMGX | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 1.18 | +1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.33 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.77 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
SEMGX vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMGX drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, smaller than the maximum ZIM drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMGX and ZIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMGX | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.21% | -84.68% | +17.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.11% | -30.66% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.37% | -57.12% | +38.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.42% | -84.68% | +43.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -10.86% | +10.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.25% | -40.03% | +14.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 12.67% | -8.70% |
Volatility
SEMGX vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) is 8.15%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that SEMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEMGX | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 11.82% | -3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.81% | 37.56% | -20.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 53.12% | -33.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 65.90% | -47.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 67.71% | -49.39% |
Dividends
SEMGX vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
SEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than ZIM's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMGX DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.25% | 3.00% | 0.15% | 2.16% | 2.16% | 1.71% | 1.23% | 1.94% | 0.71% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 0.23% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 4.91% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEMGX and ZIM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to SEMGX (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMGX dropped -67.21% vs ZIM's -84.68%.
SEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEMGX and ZIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer