SEMGX vs. MGEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio (MGEMX).
SEMGX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 7, 1996. MGEMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 24, 1992.
Performance
SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMGX DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.61% | 28.85% | 7.48% | 6.32% | -21.66% | -11.60% | 18.65% | 19.23% | -12.25% | 37.71% |
MGEMX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio | 3.63% | -34.08% | 8.07% | 12.16% | -25.07% | 3.53% | 14.59% | 37.21% | -17.34% | 34.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMGX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than MGEMX's 3.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMGX has outperformed MGEMX with an annualized return of 6.76%, while MGEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.46% annualized return.
SEMGX
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -11.27%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 28.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
MGEMX
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- -45.69%
- 1Y
- -33.16%
- 3Y*
- -6.94%
- 5Y*
- -9.33%
- 10Y*
- 1.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMGX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than MGEMX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEMGX vs. MGEMX — Risk / Return Rank
SEMGX
MGEMX
SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio (MGEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEMGX | MGEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | -0.61 | +2.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | -0.34 | +2.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.87 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | -0.66 | +2.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.84 | -1.39 | +8.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEMGX | MGEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | -0.61 | +2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | -0.33 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.06 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.28 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMGX and MGEMX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Dividend Comparison
SEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, while MGEMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMGX DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 2.95% | 3.00% | 0.15% | 2.16% | 2.16% | 1.71% | 1.23% | 1.94% | 0.71% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 0.23% |
MGEMX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.27% | 2.48% | 4.48% | 9.05% | 1.07% | 26.00% | 2.46% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMGX drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, roughly equal to the maximum MGEMX drawdown of -64.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMGX and MGEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMGX | MGEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.21% | -64.93% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.11% | -52.50% | +36.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.58% | -52.50% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.82% | -52.50% | +6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.51% | -48.42% | +34.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -19.72% | -5.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 24.89% | -21.07% |
Volatility
SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) is 9.54%, while Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio (MGEMX) has a volatility of 10.41%. This indicates that SEMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEMGX | MGEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.54% | 10.41% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.70% | 72.88% | -58.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 54.60% | -33.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 28.67% | -10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 24.48% | -6.45% |