PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMGX vs. MGEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio (MGEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMGX achieves a 31.92% return, which is significantly lower than MGEMX's 35.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMGX has outperformed MGEMX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while MGEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.10% annualized return.


SEMGX

1D
2.06%
1M
11.42%
YTD
31.92%
6M
35.83%
1Y
58.32%
3Y*
24.39%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
9.62%

MGEMX

1D
2.82%
1M
13.11%
YTD
35.19%
6M
-31.36%
1Y
-18.51%
3Y*
1.14%
5Y*
-5.19%
10Y*
4.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMGX
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
31.92%28.85%7.48%6.32%-21.66%-11.60%18.65%19.23%-12.25%37.71%
MGEMX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio
35.19%-34.08%8.07%12.16%-25.07%3.53%14.59%37.21%-17.34%34.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMGX and MGEMX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.92

The correlation between SEMGX and MGEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMGX vs. MGEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMGX
SEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MGEMX
MGEMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MGEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MGEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio (MGEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMGXMGEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.99

-0.33

+3.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

0.05

+3.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.02

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

-0.36

+3.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.61

-0.63

+15.23

SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the MGEMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMGX and MGEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMGXMGEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

-0.33

+3.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.18

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.17

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.31

-0.04

Drawdowns

SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMGX drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, roughly equal to the maximum MGEMX drawdown of -64.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMGX and MGEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMGXMGEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.21%

-64.93%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.11%

-52.50%

+36.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-52.50%

+34.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.42%

-52.50%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.82%

-52.50%

+6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-32.72%

+32.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-19.82%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

29.75%

-25.78%

Volatility

SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) is 8.28%, while Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio (MGEMX) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that SEMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMGXMGEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

8.72%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

73.56%

-56.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.04%

55.05%

-35.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.67%

28.97%

-10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

24.71%

-6.39%

SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMGX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than MGEMX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMGX vs. MGEMX - Dividend Comparison

SEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, while MGEMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGEMX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Portfolio
0.00%0.00%1.27%2.48%4.48%9.05%1.07%26.00%2.46%0.60%0.82%0.87%
SEMGX
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.27%3.00%0.15%2.16%2.16%1.71%1.23%1.94%0.71%0.62%0.54%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEMGX and MGEMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGEMX has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to SEMGX (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMGX dropped -67.21% vs MGEMX's -64.93%.

SEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMGX and MGEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer