PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEI vs. CLSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SEI vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEI achieves a 66.35% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's 70.55% return.


SEI

1D
-2.46%
1M
-2.92%
YTD
66.35%
6M
75.35%
1Y
172.00%
3Y*
115.76%
5Y*
57.53%
10Y*

CLSK

1D
0.70%
1M
31.66%
YTD
70.55%
6M
45.53%
1Y
79.42%
3Y*
64.46%
5Y*
-2.76%
10Y*
-5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEI vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
66.35%62.29%277.66%-15.75%57.46%-15.55%-38.09%19.10%-43.06%75.35%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
70.55%9.88%-16.50%440.69%-78.57%-67.23%442.99%-73.90%-15.98%-37.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SEI and CLSK is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017

0.17

The correlation between SEI and CLSK shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SEI:

$1.03

CLSK:

-$2.24

PS Ratio

SEI:

4.97

CLSK:

5.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEI:

$692.11M

CLSK:

$739.88M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEI:

$235.28M

CLSK:

$306.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

SEI:

$249.65M

CLSK:

-$103.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEI vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEI
SEI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSK
CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEI vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEICLSKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.20

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.55

1.23

+5.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.48

2.04

+14.44

SEI vs. CLSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEI and CLSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEI vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEI drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEI and CLSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEICLSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.49%

-98.56%

+19.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.43%

-64.74%

+38.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.37%

-71.28%

+15.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-92.00%

+36.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.92%

-76.36%

+73.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.58%

-69.76%

+31.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

39.02%

-28.54%

Volatility

SEI vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) have volatilities of 22.10% and 22.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEICLSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.10%

22.12%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.80%

62.59%

-11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.21%

88.76%

-15.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.84%

100.80%

-33.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.28%

183.30%

-121.02%

Dividends

SEI vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

SEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while CLSK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
0.63%1.04%1.67%5.65%4.23%6.41%5.16%2.89%0.83%

Financials

SEI vs. CLSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
196.24M
136.41M
(SEI) Total Revenue
(CLSK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SEI and CLSK have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLSK has higher volatility (22.12%) compared to SEI (22.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEI dropped -79.49% vs CLSK's -98.56%.

SEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEI and CLSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer