SEF vs. NVDQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ).
SEF and NVDQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SEF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). It was launched on Jun 12, 2008. NVDQ is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Oct 18, 2023.
Performance
SEF vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEF vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 11.27% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -12.36% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 2.80% | -74.63% | -93.80% | -30.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's 2.80% return.
SEF
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 2.76%
- 3Y*
- -10.01%
- 5Y*
- -6.70%
- 10Y*
- -11.67%
NVDQ
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- -5.50%
- 1Y
- -76.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEF vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
NVDQ
SEF vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEF | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | -0.93 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.36 | -1.68 | +2.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.79 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | -0.91 | +0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | -1.03 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEF | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.93 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.87 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and NVDQ is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SEF vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than NVDQ's 0.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.27% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.25% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SEF vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and NVDQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -99.13% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -85.00% | +64.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.00% | -98.96% | +2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.58% | -87.43% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.44% | 74.62% | -60.18% |
Volatility
SEF vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 4.86%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) has a volatility of 20.90%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 20.90% | -16.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 51.76% | -40.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.28% | 82.26% | -62.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 96.76% | -78.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 96.76% | -76.21% |