PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDQ vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVDQ vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVDQ vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
4.46%-74.63%-93.80%-30.70%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-6.48%38.92%171.25%17.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -6.48% return.


NVDQ

1D
-11.16%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
4.46%
6M
-4.52%
1Y
-76.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
5.59%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
-6.48%
6M
-6.52%
1Y
60.95%
3Y*
84.54%
5Y*
66.14%
10Y*
69.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDQ
NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDQ vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDQNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.93

1.48

-2.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.69

2.17

-3.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.27

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

2.92

-3.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.02

7.39

-8.41

NVDQ vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDQ and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDQNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

1.48

-2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

0.61

-1.48

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and NVDA is -1.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

NVDQ vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
0.25%0.26%4.59%11.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and NVDA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDQNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.13%

-89.72%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.00%

-20.21%

-64.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.94%

-15.76%

-83.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.41%

-36.40%

-51.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

74.44%

7.99%

+66.45%

Volatility

NVDQ vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) has a higher volatility of 20.96% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.46%. This indicates that NVDQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVDQNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.96%

10.46%

+10.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.99%

25.91%

+26.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.28%

41.44%

+40.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.83%

51.74%

+45.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.83%

49.85%

+46.98%