NVDQ vs. NVDS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS).

NVDQ and NVDS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NVDQ is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Oct 18, 2023. NVDS is a passively managed fund by AXS that tracks the performance of the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%). It was launched on Jul 13, 2022.

Performance

NVDQ vs. NVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NVDQ vs. NVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	2.80%	-74.63%	-93.80%	-30.70%
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	4.50%	-58.18%	-80.03%	-18.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than NVDS's 4.50% return.

NVDQ

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 4.57%
• YTD: 2.80%
• 6M: -5.50%
• 1Y: -76.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDS

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 4.35%
• YTD: 4.50%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: -61.30%
• 3Y*: -66.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDQ vs. NVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDQ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDS's 1.15% expense ratio.

NVDS

Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF

NVDQ

T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF

Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. NVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

NVDS

NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDQ vs. NVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDQ	NVDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	-1.00	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.68	-1.58	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	0.80	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	-0.84	-0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	-0.99	-0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDQ vs. NVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is comparable to the NVDS Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDQ and NVDS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDQ	NVDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.93	-1.00	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.87	-1.00	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and NVDS is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NVDQ vs. NVDS - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than NVDS's 13.58% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.25%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%	0.00%
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	13.58%	14.19%	14.11%	14.69%	5.72%

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. NVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDS drawdown of -99.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and NVDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDQ	NVDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.13%	-99.20%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.00%	-73.78%	-11.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.96%	-99.04%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.43%	-82.67%	-4.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	74.62%	62.62%	+12.00%

Volatility

NVDQ vs. NVDS - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) has a higher volatility of 20.90% compared to Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) at 15.70%. This indicates that NVDQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDQ	NVDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.90%	15.70%	+5.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.76%	38.76%	+13.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.26%	61.42%	+20.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	96.76%	69.38%	+27.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	96.76%	69.38%	+27.38%