SEF vs. EUFN
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEF returned -12.30%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for EUFN. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EUFN.
Performance
SEF vs. EUFN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than EUFN's 12.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has underperformed EUFN with an annualized return of -12.30%, while EUFN has yielded a comparatively higher 14.40% annualized return.
SEF
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- 6M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- -5.36%
- 3Y*
- -12.03%
- 5Y*
- -7.58%
- 10Y*
- -12.30%
EUFN
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 32.81%
- 3Y*
- 32.72%
- 5Y*
- 21.84%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
SEF vs. EUFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -2.09% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 12.15% | 65.73% | 17.20% | 26.15% | -8.78% | 19.13% | -8.55% | 20.73% | -23.14% | 26.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and EUFN is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010 | -0.70 |
The correlation between SEF and EUFN shifts across timeframes, from -0.70 (all time) to -0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SEF vs. EUFN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
EUFN
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SEF
EUFN
Basic Materials
SEF
-
EUFN
-
Communication Services
SEF
-
EUFN
-
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
EUFN
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
EUFN
-
Energy
SEF
-
EUFN
-
Healthcare
SEF
-
EUFN
-
Industrials
SEF
-
EUFN
Real Estate
SEF
-
EUFN
-
Technology
SEF
-
EUFN
Utilities
SEF
-
EUFN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. EUFN — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
EUFN
SEF vs. EUFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.28 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 2.23 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 7.81 | -8.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. EUFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than EUFN's maximum drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and EUFN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -53.25% | -43.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -14.77% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -15.95% | -23.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -35.15% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.40% | -53.25% | -20.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.48% | -0.30% | -96.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.78% | -14.46% | -68.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 4.21% | +1.44% |
Volatility
SEF vs. EUFN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 4.21%, while iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.72% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 17.33% | -6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 20.06% | -5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 21.83% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 23.68% | -3.24% |
SEF vs. EUFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EUFN's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. EUFN - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than EUFN's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 4.09% | 3.57% | 5.36% | 5.00% | 4.24% | 4.15% | 1.38% | 4.55% | 6.48% | 3.04% | 4.03% | 3.65% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.43% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and EUFN have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUFN has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SEF (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs EUFN's -53.25%.
On 10-year performance, EUFN leads with 14.40% vs -12.30% for SEF. On fees, EUFN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 14.40% return vs -12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUFN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.
EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 3.43% for SEF.
SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EUFN is Financials Equities. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.49% for EUFN.
EUFN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and EUFN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer