NVDQ vs. NVD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDQ returned -68.82% vs -67.15% for NVD. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NVDQ charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for NVD.

Performance

NVDQ vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVDQ having a -36.13% return and NVD slightly higher at -34.83%.

NVDQ

• 1D: 7.09%
• 1M: -18.40%
• YTD: -36.13%
• 6M: -41.91%
• 1Y: -68.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVD

• 1D: 7.13%
• 1M: -18.10%
• YTD: -34.83%
• 6M: -40.44%
• 1Y: -67.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDQ vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-36.13%	-74.63%	-93.80%	-30.70%
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	-34.83%	-73.27%	-93.09%	-22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and NVD is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023	0.99

The correlation between NVDQ and NVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

NVD

NVD Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDQ vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDQ	NVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.02	-0.98	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.82	-1.70	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	0.81	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	-0.93	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	-1.41	-0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDQ vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is comparable to the NVD Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDQ and NVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDQ	NVD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.02	-0.98	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.89	-0.87	-0.02

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, roughly equal to the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and NVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDQ	NVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.45%	-99.26%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.67%	-72.64%	-1.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.35%	-99.12%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.21%	-81.65%	-6.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.57%	47.63%	+0.94%

Volatility

NVDQ vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) have volatilities of 25.84% and 26.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDQ	NVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.84%	26.02%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.78%	52.01%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.86%	68.60%	-0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.52%	92.60%	+2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.52%	92.60%	+2.92%

NVDQ vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDQ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDQ vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than NVD's 18.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	18.15%	11.83%	8.68%	15.78%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.41%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDQ and NVD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, NVDQ and NVD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NVDQ or NVD?

NVD has higher volatility (26.02%) compared to NVDQ (25.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDQ dropped -99.45% vs NVD's -99.26%.

Which ETF is better, NVDQ or NVD?

On 1-year performance, NVD leads with -67.15% vs -68.82% for NVDQ. On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 25.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDQ or NVD?

Over the 1-year period, NVD has performed better with a -67.15% return vs -68.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDQ or NVD?

NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDQ or NVD?

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 18.15%, compared with 0.41% for NVDQ.

What is the main difference between NVDQ and NVD?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDQ and 1.50% for NVD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.