NVDQ vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. NVDQ is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Over the past year, NVDQ returned -63.77% vs 21.66% for GLDM. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. NVDQ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

NVDQ vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a -28.81% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -4.72% return.

NVDQ

• 1D: 8.14%
• 1M: 10.13%
• YTD: -28.81%
• 6M: -26.70%
• 1Y: -63.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -8.82%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: -8.62%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 28.79%
• 5Y*: 18.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDQ vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-28.81%	-74.63%	-93.80%	-28.84%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-4.72%	64.20%	27.08%	5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and GLDM is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	-0.06

Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 22
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDQ vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDQ	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	0.80	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.47	1.15	-2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.17	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	0.89	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	2.40	-3.79

NVDQ vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDQ and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDQ	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.45%	-24.35%	-75.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.72%	-24.35%	-46.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.28%	-23.82%	-75.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.29%	-6.32%	-81.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.56%	9.05%	+39.51%

Volatility

NVDQ vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) has a higher volatility of 26.30% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 8.16%. This indicates that NVDQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDQ	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.30%	8.16%	+18.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.23%	24.22%	+30.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.44%	27.36%	+43.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.43%	18.15%	+77.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.43%	17.02%	+78.41%

NVDQ vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDQ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDQ vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.37%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDQ and GLDM in my portfolio?

NVDQ and GLDM have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDQ or GLDM?

NVDQ has higher volatility (26.30%) compared to GLDM (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDQ dropped -99.45% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

Which ETF is better, NVDQ or GLDM?

On 1-year performance, GLDM leads with 21.66% vs -63.77% for NVDQ. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 8.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDQ or GLDM?

Over the 1-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 21.66% return vs -63.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDQ or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDQ or GLDM?

NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between NVDQ and GLDM?

NVDQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GLDM is Gold. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDQ and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.