SEF vs. SPY
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEF returned -12.23%/yr vs 15.08%/yr for SPY. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
SEF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of -12.23%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.08% annualized return.
SEF
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- -3.98%
- 3Y*
- -12.00%
- 5Y*
- -7.28%
- 10Y*
- -12.23%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
SEF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -1.02% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.45% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and SPY is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2008 | -0.83 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SEF and SPY has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.83 to -0.54, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
SEF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
SPY
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SEF
SPY
Basic Materials
SEF
-
SPY
Communication Services
SEF
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
SPY
Energy
SEF
-
SPY
Healthcare
SEF
-
SPY
Industrials
SEF
-
SPY
Real Estate
SEF
-
SPY
Technology
SEF
-
SPY
Utilities
SEF
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
SPY
SEF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.31 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 2.43 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 10.57 | -11.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -55.19% | -41.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.12% | -8.88% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -18.76% | -20.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -24.50% | -17.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.40% | -33.72% | -39.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.45% | -1.12% | -95.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.78% | -9.02% | -73.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 2.03% | +3.40% |
Volatility
SEF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 4.26% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 10.01% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 12.60% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 17.17% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 17.93% | +2.52% |
SEF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than SPY's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.39% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and SPY have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEF has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to SPY (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.08% vs -12.23% for SEF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.08% return vs -12.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.
SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer