PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEA vs. XLII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEA vs. XLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEA achieves a 20.79% return, which is significantly higher than XLII's 6.89% return.


SEA

1D
-0.80%
1M
0.23%
YTD
20.79%
6M
21.12%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
10Y*

XLII

1D
0.86%
1M
1.58%
YTD
6.89%
6M
9.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEA vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SEA and XLII is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.51

SEA vs. XLII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEA
XLII

Industrials

82.7%

-

Energy

17.3%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

-1.6%

-

Industrials

SEA
82.7%
XLII

-

Energy

SEA
17.3%
XLII

-

Communication Services

SEA
0.0%
XLII

-

Basic Materials

SEA

-

XLII

-

Consumer Cyclical

SEA

-

XLII

-

Consumer Defensive

SEA

-

XLII

-

Financial Services

SEA

-

XLII
100.3%

Healthcare

SEA

-

XLII

-

Real Estate

SEA

-

XLII

-

Utilities

SEA

-

XLII

-

Technology

SEA
-1.6%
XLII

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEA vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEA
SEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

XLII
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEA vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEAXLIIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.52

SEA vs. XLII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEAXLIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.46

-1.07

Drawdowns

SEA vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA and XLII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEAXLIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.53%

-10.10%

-29.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-0.21%

-2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-1.35%

-12.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

Volatility

SEA vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEAXLIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

11.57%

+4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

11.57%

+10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.67%

11.57%

+10.10%

SEA vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEA vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison

SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than XLII's 11.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
5.59%6.76%18.47%9.85%18.73%
XLII
State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.27%5.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEA and XLII have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEA.

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 11.27%, compared with 5.59% for SEA.

SEA is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: US Global and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEA and 0.35% for XLII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEA and XLII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer