SEA vs. XLII

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SEA (U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF) and XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEA is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. SEA is passively managed, while XLII is actively managed. Over the past year, SEA returned 39.67% vs 20.71% for XLII. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLII.

Performance

SEA vs. XLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEA achieves a 30.54% return, which is significantly higher than XLII's 11.91% return.

SEA

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 10.88%
• 6M: 20.96%
• YTD: 30.54%
• 1Y: 39.67%
• 3Y*: 18.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.73%

XLII

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -0.49%
• 6M: 8.98%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 20.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	$126.54K	$400.87K	$241.46K
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$449.50K	$324.22K	$213.70K

SEA vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	30.54%	3.87%
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.91%	6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SEA and XLII is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.43

SEA vs. XLII - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEA	XLII
Industrials	95.5%	93.8%
Energy	3.5%	-
Technology	0.1%	5.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-
Communication Services	-0.1%	-

Return for Risk

SEA vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEA

SEA Risk / Return Rank: 90
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 89

XLII

XLII Risk / Return Rank: 66
XLII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
XLII Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XLII Omega Ratio Rank: 69
XLII Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
XLII Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEA vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEA	XLII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	1.59	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	2.26	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.29	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	1.93	+1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.91	8.68	+5.23

SEA vs. XLII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the XLII Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEA and XLII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEA vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA and XLII.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEA	XLII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.53%	-10.10%	-29.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-10.10%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-1.32%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.90%	-1.28%	-12.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	2.24%	+0.63%

Volatility

SEA vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) at 3.82%. This indicates that SEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEA	XLII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	3.82%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.15%	10.44%	+2.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.95%	12.25%	+4.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.55%	12.23%	+9.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.55%	12.23%	+9.32%

SEA vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEA vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison

SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than XLII's 12.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	5.18%	6.76%	18.47%	9.85%	18.73%
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	12.08%	5.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEA and XLII in my portfolio?

SEA and XLII have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEA or XLII?

SEA has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to XLII (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEA dropped -39.53% vs XLII's -10.10%.

Which ETF is better, SEA or XLII?

On 1-year performance, SEA leads with 39.67% vs 20.71% for XLII. On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLII has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEA or XLII?

Over the 1-year period, SEA has performed better with a 39.67% return vs 20.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEA or XLII?

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEA or XLII?

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 12.08%, compared with 5.18% for SEA.

What is the main difference between SEA and XLII?

SEA is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: US Global and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEA and 0.35% for XLII.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.