SCUB vs. TINS
SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) and TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCUB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TINS.
Performance
SCUB vs. TINS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCUB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TINS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCUB vs. TINS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.38% |
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 13.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCUB and TINS is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCUB vs. TINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCUB vs. TINS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCUB drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum TINS drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUB and TINS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCUB | TINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -10.79% | +10.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.38% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -2.17% | +2.16% |
Volatility
SCUB vs. TINS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCUB | TINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 17.48% | -16.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 17.48% | -16.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 17.48% | -16.64% |
SCUB vs. TINS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TINS's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCUB vs. TINS - Dividend Comparison
SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than TINS's 0.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% |
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 0.21% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCUB and TINS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TINS.
SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.
They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Franklin Templeton Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SCUB and 0.55% for TINS.
Find the right allocation for SCUB and TINS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer