SCUB vs. TFFI
SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) and TFFI (Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. SCUB charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TFFI.
Performance
SCUB vs. TFFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCUB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFFI
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCUB vs. TFFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.26% |
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCUB and TFFI is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCUB vs. TFFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCUB vs. TFFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCUB drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum TFFI drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUB and TFFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCUB | TFFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -4.23% | +4.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -1.62% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -1.65% | +1.64% |
Volatility
SCUB vs. TFFI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCUB | TFFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 8.02% | -7.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.79% | 8.02% | -7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.79% | 8.02% | -7.23% |
SCUB vs. TFFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TFFI's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCUB vs. TFFI - Dividend Comparison
SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while TFFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.33% |
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCUB and TFFI have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.
SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for TFFI.
They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Chesapeake. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SCUB and 1.01% for TFFI.
Find the right allocation for SCUB and TFFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer