TINS vs. USFI
TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) and USFI (BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TINS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for USFI.
Performance
TINS vs. USFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINS achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than USFI's 0.45% return.
TINS
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
USFI
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.04K | $769.30 | $2.04K | |
| $228.87 | $276.61 | $7.08K |
TINS vs. USFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 11.09% | 3.11% |
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF | 0.45% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINS and USFI is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINS vs. USFI — Risk / Return Rank
TINS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USFI
TINS vs. USFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINS | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINS vs. USFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, which is greater than USFI's maximum drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and USFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINS | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -8.47% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -1.11% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -2.06% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.47% | — |
Volatility
TINS vs. USFI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINS | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 3.22% | +14.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 6.85% | +10.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 6.85% | +10.46% |
TINS vs. USFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than USFI's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINS vs. USFI - Dividend Comparison
TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than USFI's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 0.21% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF | 4.46% | 4.42% | 4.60% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINS and USFI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFI is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFI is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TINS.
USFI has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and BrandywineGLOBAL. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.39% for USFI.
Find the right allocation for TINS and USFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer