SCHV vs. GCOW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).

SCHV and GCOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHV is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016. Both SCHV and GCOW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SCHV vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SCHV vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	3.89%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-7.65%	25.58%	2.64%	25.92%	-7.30%	16.56%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.89%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.49%	14.58%	-4.33%	17.81%	-7.99%	20.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHV having a 10.62% annualized return and GCOW not far behind at 10.17%.

SCHV

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -4.32%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 6.05%
• 1Y: 17.64%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 9.37%
• 10Y*: 10.62%

GCOW

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.51%
• YTD: 12.89%
• 6M: 18.87%
• 1Y: 30.54%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

GCOW

Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF

SCHV

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

Return for Risk

SCHV vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 62
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 92
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHV	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.21	-1.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.94	-1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.43	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	2.80	-1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	14.21	-7.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHV vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and GCOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHV	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	2.21	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	1.01	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.63	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.60	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and GCOW is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SCHV vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than GCOW's 4.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.96%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.41%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, roughly equal to the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHV	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-37.64%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.93%	-10.79%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.78%	-21.48%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.08%	-37.64%	+0.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.58%	-2.11%	-2.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-5.90%	+2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	2.18%	+0.37%

Volatility

SCHV vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 3.45%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHV	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	3.45%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.08%	7.89%	+0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	13.89%	+1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.48%	13.48%	+1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.91%	16.24%	+0.67%