SCHM vs. XLY
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHM returned 11.48%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for XLY. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.
Performance
SCHM vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 11.48%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
SCHM
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
XLY
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -2.41%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
SCHM vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 18.78% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.41% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and XLY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SCHM and XLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHM vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
XLY
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Technology
SCHM
XLY
Industrials
SCHM
XLY
Healthcare
SCHM
XLY
-
Financial Services
SCHM
XLY
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
XLY
Real Estate
SCHM
XLY
-
Basic Materials
SCHM
XLY
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
XLY
-
Energy
SCHM
XLY
-
Utilities
SCHM
XLY
-
Communication Services
SCHM
XLY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
XLY
SCHM vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHM | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.10 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 0.62 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 1.89 | +11.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -59.05% | +16.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -14.98% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -26.01% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | -39.67% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -39.67% | -2.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -6.41% | +6.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -9.55% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 4.86% | -2.53% |
Volatility
SCHM vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) is 5.59%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that SCHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 6.20% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 13.52% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 18.29% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 23.84% | -4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 22.08% | -1.58% |
SCHM vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHM vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHM and XLY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to SCHM (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs XLY's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.72% vs 11.48% for SCHM. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLY.
SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.
SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.13% for XLY.
SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer