SCHM vs. VOO
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHM returned 11.48%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
SCHM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.48%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.51% annualized return.
SCHM
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 6M
- 18.68%
- 1Y
- 32.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 15.51%
SCHM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 18.48% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.00% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and VOO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SCHM and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHM vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
VOO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
SCHM
VOO
Industrials
SCHM
VOO
Financial Services
SCHM
VOO
Healthcare
SCHM
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
VOO
Real Estate
SCHM
VOO
Basic Materials
SCHM
VOO
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
VOO
Energy
SCHM
VOO
Utilities
SCHM
VOO
Communication Services
SCHM
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
VOO
SCHM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 2.88 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 12.99 | +0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -33.99% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -8.90% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -18.69% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | -24.52% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -33.99% | -8.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -2.41% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.64% | -3.68% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.97% | +0.36% |
Volatility
SCHM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.65%. This indicates that SCHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 4.65% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 9.76% | +2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 12.37% | +3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 16.91% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 18.05% | +2.46% |
SCHM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHM and VOO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHM has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to VOO (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.51% vs 11.48% for SCHM. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.51% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHM.
SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer