SCHM vs. IJH
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHM tracks the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap while IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHM returned 11.48%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for IJH. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
SCHM vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly higher than IJH's 14.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHM having a 11.48% annualized return and IJH not far behind at 11.42%.
SCHM
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 6M
- 18.68%
- 1Y
- 32.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
IJH
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 26.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
SCHM vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 18.48% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.16% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and IJH is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SCHM and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHM vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
IJH
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
SCHM
IJH
Industrials
SCHM
IJH
Financial Services
SCHM
IJH
Healthcare
SCHM
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
IJH
Real Estate
SCHM
IJH
Basic Materials
SCHM
IJH
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
IJH
Energy
SCHM
IJH
Utilities
SCHM
IJH
Communication Services
SCHM
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
IJH
SCHM vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHM | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 2.97 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 10.86 | +3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -55.07% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -8.83% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -24.10% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | -24.10% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -42.18% | -0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -1.55% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.64% | -7.56% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.41% | -0.08% |
Volatility
SCHM vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 4.96%. This indicates that SCHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 4.96% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 11.70% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 15.84% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 19.79% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 21.20% | -0.69% |
SCHM vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHM vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than IJH's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SCHM and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHM has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to IJH (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, SCHM leads with 11.48% vs 11.42% for IJH. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IJH.
SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 1.18% for IJH.
SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.05% for IJH.
SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer