PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHM vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHM vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 21.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHM having a 11.48% annualized return and SCHA not far behind at 11.43%.


SCHM

1D
-1.33%
1M
5.18%
YTD
18.48%
6M
18.68%
1Y
32.40%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
11.48%

SCHA

1D
-1.06%
1M
6.46%
YTD
21.05%
6M
20.63%
1Y
42.15%
3Y*
18.20%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHM vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
18.48%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
21.05%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHM and SCHA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.97

The correlation between SCHM and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHM vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHM
SCHA

Technology

22.1%
22.7%

Industrials

21.7%
15.7%

Financial Services

10.9%
15.7%

Healthcare

10.9%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
9.2%

Real Estate

6.4%
6.1%

Basic Materials

4.7%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
2.6%

Energy

3.4%
5.4%

Utilities

2.9%
2.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.4%

Technology

SCHM
22.1%
SCHA
22.7%

Industrials

SCHM
21.7%
SCHA
15.7%

Financial Services

SCHM
10.9%
SCHA
15.7%

Healthcare

SCHM
10.9%
SCHA
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHM
10.8%
SCHA
9.2%

Real Estate

SCHM
6.4%
SCHA
6.1%

Basic Materials

SCHM
4.7%
SCHA
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

SCHM
3.4%
SCHA
2.6%

Energy

SCHM
3.4%
SCHA
5.4%

Utilities

SCHM
2.9%
SCHA
2.3%

Communication Services

SCHM
2.6%
SCHA
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHM vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHM vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHMSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

4.46

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.97

16.33

-2.36

SCHM vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHM and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHM vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHMSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.43%

-42.41%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-9.50%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-27.29%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

-30.79%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-42.41%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-2.16%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-7.57%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.59%

-0.26%

Volatility

SCHM vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) is 5.62%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that SCHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHMSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

6.55%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

13.68%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

18.59%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

22.05%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.51%

22.77%

-2.26%

SCHM vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHM and SCHA have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHM vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than SCHA's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.23%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SCHM and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to SCHM (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 10-year performance, SCHM leads with 11.48% vs 11.43% for SCHA. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHM and SCHA have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.99% for SCHA.

SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHM and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer