SCHM vs. SCHA
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHM returned 11.48%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for SCHA. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHM vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 21.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHM having a 11.48% annualized return and SCHA not far behind at 11.43%.
SCHM
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 6M
- 18.68%
- 1Y
- 32.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
SCHA
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 21.05%
- 6M
- 20.63%
- 1Y
- 42.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
SCHM vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 18.48% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 21.05% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and SCHA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SCHM and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHM vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
SCHA
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
SCHM
SCHA
Industrials
SCHM
SCHA
Financial Services
SCHM
SCHA
Healthcare
SCHM
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
SCHA
Real Estate
SCHM
SCHA
Basic Materials
SCHM
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
SCHA
Energy
SCHM
SCHA
Utilities
SCHM
SCHA
Communication Services
SCHM
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
SCHA
SCHM vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 4.46 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 16.33 | -2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -42.41% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -9.50% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -27.29% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | -30.79% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -42.41% | -0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -2.16% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.64% | -7.57% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.59% | -0.26% |
Volatility
SCHM vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) is 5.62%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that SCHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 6.55% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 13.68% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 18.59% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 22.05% | -2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 22.77% | -2.26% |
SCHM vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHM and SCHA have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHM vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than SCHA's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, SCHM and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to SCHM (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 10-year performance, SCHM leads with 11.48% vs 11.43% for SCHA. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM and SCHA have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.99% for SCHA.
SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer