PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's 6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 18.38%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.07% annualized return.


SCHG

1D
-2.99%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
3.59%
6M
2.53%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
18.38%

VIG

1D
-1.37%
1M
1.51%
YTD
6.56%
6M
6.11%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
13.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
3.59%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
6.56%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and VIG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.83

The correlation between SCHG and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHG vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHG
VIG

Technology

46.3%
26.2%

Communication Services

16.0%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
4.7%

Healthcare

7.7%
16.5%

Financial Services

6.7%
20.6%

Industrials

5.8%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
10.1%

Basic Materials

1.4%
3.5%

Energy

0.8%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Utilities

0.4%
3.2%

Technology

SCHG
46.3%
VIG
26.2%

Communication Services

SCHG
16.0%
VIG
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHG
12.7%
VIG
4.7%

Healthcare

SCHG
7.7%
VIG
16.5%

Financial Services

SCHG
6.7%
VIG
20.6%

Industrials

SCHG
5.8%
VIG
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCHG
1.7%
VIG
10.1%

Basic Materials

SCHG
1.4%
VIG
3.5%

Energy

SCHG
0.8%
VIG
3.5%

Real Estate

SCHG
0.5%
VIG

-

Utilities

SCHG
0.4%
VIG
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHGVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.41

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.47

9.72

-5.26

SCHG vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHGVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.89

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.73

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.82

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.60

+0.24

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-46.81%

+12.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-7.91%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-14.95%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-20.39%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-31.72%

-2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.39%

-1.37%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-5.51%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

1.96%

+2.95%

Volatility

SCHG vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.57%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

2.57%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

7.69%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

10.10%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.30%

14.24%

+8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

16.05%

+5.52%

SCHG vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHG and VIG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHG vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than VIG's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.48%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHG and VIG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to VIG (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.38% vs 13.07% for VIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.38% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG and VIG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VIG is Dividend. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer