PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 18.77%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and VGT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.94

The correlation between SCHG and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHG vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHG
VGT

Technology

46.3%
98.5%

Communication Services

16.0%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
0.1%

Healthcare

7.7%
0.0%

Financial Services

6.7%
0.5%

Industrials

5.8%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%
0.0%

Energy

0.8%
0.3%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Technology

SCHG
46.3%
VGT
98.5%

Communication Services

SCHG
16.0%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHG
12.7%
VGT
0.1%

Healthcare

SCHG
7.7%
VGT
0.0%

Financial Services

SCHG
6.7%
VGT
0.5%

Industrials

SCHG
5.8%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

SCHG
1.7%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

SCHG
1.4%
VGT
0.0%

Energy

SCHG
0.8%
VGT
0.3%

Real Estate

SCHG
0.5%
VGT

-

Utilities

SCHG
0.4%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHGVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.47

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.69

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

11.77

-6.73

SCHG vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHGVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.95

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.89

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

1.05

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.68

+0.16

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-54.63%

+20.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-16.40%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-27.23%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-35.07%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-35.07%

+0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-1.48%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-7.95%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

5.13%

-0.23%

Volatility

SCHG vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 3.61%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

6.39%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

16.07%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

20.57%

-5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

25.18%

-2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

24.60%

-3.05%

SCHG vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHG vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHG and VGT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 18.77% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 18.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer