SCHG vs. PXF
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while PXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHG returned 18.50%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for PXF. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PXF.
Performance
SCHG vs. PXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed PXF with an annualized return of 18.50%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
PXF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 39.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
SCHG vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 18.79% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 2.58% | 17.50% | -14.84% | 24.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and PXF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SCHG and PXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHG vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
PXF
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
SCHG
PXF
Communication Services
SCHG
PXF
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
PXF
Healthcare
SCHG
PXF
Financial Services
SCHG
PXF
Industrials
SCHG
PXF
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
PXF
Basic Materials
SCHG
PXF
Energy
SCHG
PXF
Real Estate
SCHG
PXF
Utilities
SCHG
PXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
PXF
SCHG vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.45 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 3.66 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 13.76 | -9.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and PXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -64.74% | +30.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -10.91% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -14.06% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -26.82% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | -41.59% | +7.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -2.04% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -15.25% | +10.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 2.90% | +2.06% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.14%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 6.76% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 13.95% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 16.18% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 16.62% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 18.07% | +3.51% |
SCHG vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHG vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than PXF's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and PXF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXF has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs PXF's -64.74%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 12.26% for PXF. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.
PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.45% for PXF.
PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and PXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer