PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXF vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXF vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 19.54% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 11.89%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.05% annualized return.


PXF

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.12%
6M
11.81%
YTD
19.54%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
11.89%
ALL TIME*
5.47%

VEA

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.27%
6M
7.42%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.14M$5.97M$6.84M
$674.44M$796.70M$806.62M

PXF vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXF
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
19.54%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.84%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PXF and VEA is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.94

The correlation between PXF and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXF vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXF
VEA

Financial Services

20.9%
23.1%

Industrials

14.6%
17.9%

Technology

13.8%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
7.3%

Basic Materials

9.1%
6.9%

Energy

8.7%
4.5%

Healthcare

7.5%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
5.3%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.2%

Utilities

3.4%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.5%

Financial Services

PXF
20.9%
VEA
23.1%

Industrials

PXF
14.6%
VEA
17.9%

Technology

PXF
13.8%
VEA
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PXF
9.9%
VEA
7.3%

Basic Materials

PXF
9.1%
VEA
6.9%

Energy

PXF
8.7%
VEA
4.5%

Healthcare

PXF
7.5%
VEA
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

PXF
6.5%
VEA
5.3%

Communication Services

PXF
4.0%
VEA
3.2%

Utilities

PXF
3.4%
VEA
3.1%

Real Estate

PXF
1.7%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXF vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXF vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXFVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.53

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.89

9.44

+3.45

PXF vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXF and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXF vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXFVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-60.68%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-11.63%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-13.45%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-29.71%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.59%

-35.73%

-5.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-2.45%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-13.20%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.10%

-0.04%

Volatility

PXF vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) is 4.68%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that PXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXFVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

5.40%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

15.40%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

17.25%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.84%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

17.21%

+0.56%

PXF vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXF has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXF vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than VEA's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXF
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.07%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.57%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PXF and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to PXF (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 11.89% vs 10.05% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 11.89% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for PXF.

PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.57% for VEA.

PXF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex-US 1000 Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for PXF and 0.03% for VEA.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXF and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer