PXF vs. VEA
PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PXF tracks the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index while VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXF returned 12.13%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
PXF vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 12.13%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.
PXF
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 38.71%
- 3Y*
- 23.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
VEA
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 13.11%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 30.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
PXF vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 15.96% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 2.58% | 17.50% | -14.84% | 24.52% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 13.11% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXF and VEA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between PXF and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
PXF vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXF
VEA
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
PXF
VEA
Technology
PXF
VEA
Industrials
PXF
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
PXF
VEA
Basic Materials
PXF
VEA
Energy
PXF
VEA
Healthcare
PXF
VEA
Consumer Defensive
PXF
VEA
Communication Services
PXF
VEA
Utilities
PXF
VEA
Real Estate
PXF
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXF vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
PXF
VEA
PXF vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXF | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.33 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 2.62 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.32 | 10.06 | +3.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXF vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXF | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -60.68% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -11.63% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -13.45% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -29.71% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.59% | -35.73% | -5.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -3.07% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.24% | -13.26% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.02% | -0.10% |
Volatility
PXF vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 6.95% and 7.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXF | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 7.09% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.28% | 14.74% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 16.79% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 16.76% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 17.21% | +0.60% |
PXF vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXF vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than VEA's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.17% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.58% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, PXF and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VEA has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to PXF (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 12.13% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 12.13% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.
PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.58% for VEA.
PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.03% for VEA.
PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXF and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer