PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXF vs. PXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXF vs. PXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 19.54% return, which is significantly higher than PXH's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has outperformed PXH with an annualized return of 11.89%, while PXH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.


PXF

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.12%
6M
11.81%
YTD
19.54%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
11.89%
ALL TIME*
5.47%

PXH

1D
0.97%
1M
4.81%
6M
6.84%
YTD
14.20%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
9.64%
ALL TIME*
3.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.14M$5.97M$6.84M
$5.58M$7.03M$7.21M

PXF vs. PXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXF
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
19.54%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
14.20%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PXF and PXH is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.77

The correlation between PXF and PXH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXF vs. PXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXF
PXH

Financial Services

20.9%
26.1%

Industrials

14.6%
4.6%

Technology

13.8%
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.7%

Basic Materials

9.1%
10.9%

Energy

8.7%
10.8%

Healthcare

7.5%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
2.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
6.2%

Utilities

3.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.5%

Financial Services

PXF
20.9%
PXH
26.1%

Industrials

PXF
14.6%
PXH
4.6%

Technology

PXF
13.8%
PXH
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PXF
9.9%
PXH
9.7%

Basic Materials

PXF
9.1%
PXH
10.9%

Energy

PXF
8.7%
PXH
10.8%

Healthcare

PXF
7.5%
PXH
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

PXF
6.5%
PXH
2.9%

Communication Services

PXF
4.0%
PXH
6.2%

Utilities

PXF
3.4%
PXH
2.2%

Real Estate

PXF
1.7%
PXH
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXF vs. PXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXF vs. PXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXFPXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.80

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.89

8.74

+4.15

PXF vs. PXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the PXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXF and PXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXF vs. PXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, roughly equal to the maximum PXH drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and PXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXFPXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-63.63%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-10.24%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-17.72%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-29.59%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.59%

-40.42%

-1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-2.00%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-16.76%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.28%

-0.22%

Volatility

PXF vs. PXH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) have volatilities of 4.68% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXFPXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

4.46%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

13.66%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

16.46%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

17.94%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

19.86%

-2.09%

PXF vs. PXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXF has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than PXH's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXF vs. PXH - Dividend Comparison

PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than PXH's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXF
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.07%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
4.21%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXF and PXH have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXF has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to PXH (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs PXH's -63.63%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 11.89% vs 9.64% for PXH. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 11.89% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXF is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.07% for PXF.

PXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PXH is Emerging Markets Equities. PXF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex-US 1000 Index, while PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for PXF and 0.50% for PXH.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXF and PXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer