PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. PBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than PBUS's 10.82% return.


SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%

PBUS

1D
-0.64%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.68%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%8.16%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
10.82%17.58%24.99%27.33%-19.64%26.77%21.75%31.60%-4.77%7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and PBUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017

0.85

The correlation between SCHG and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHG vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHG
PBUS

Technology

46.3%
35.4%

Communication Services

16.0%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
10.1%

Healthcare

7.7%
8.6%

Financial Services

6.7%
11.6%

Industrials

5.8%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
4.8%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.8%

Energy

0.8%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.9%

Utilities

0.4%
2.3%

Technology

SCHG
46.3%
PBUS
35.4%

Communication Services

SCHG
16.0%
PBUS
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHG
12.7%
PBUS
10.1%

Healthcare

SCHG
7.7%
PBUS
8.6%

Financial Services

SCHG
6.7%
PBUS
11.6%

Industrials

SCHG
5.8%
PBUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

SCHG
1.7%
PBUS
4.8%

Basic Materials

SCHG
1.4%
PBUS
1.8%

Energy

SCHG
0.8%
PBUS
3.6%

Real Estate

SCHG
0.5%
PBUS
1.9%

Utilities

SCHG
0.4%
PBUS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHGPBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.08

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

13.93

-8.89

SCHG vs. PBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the PBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and PBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHGPBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.30

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.80

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.80

+0.05

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and PBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGPBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-33.15%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-9.02%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-19.07%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-25.40%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-0.64%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-5.13%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

1.99%

+2.91%

Volatility

SCHG vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.94%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGPBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

2.94%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

9.13%

+2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

12.06%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

17.05%

+5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

19.33%

+2.22%

SCHG vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHG and PBUS have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHG vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than PBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
0.98%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SCHG and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs PBUS's -33.15%.

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 15.59% vs 13.48% for PBUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 15.59% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG and PBUS have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco.

PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and PBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer