PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 18.62%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively lower 14.19% annualized return.


SCHG

1D
0.67%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
0.90%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
13.64%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
18.62%

DGRW

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
6.48%
6M
5.33%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.90%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
6.48%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and DGRW is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.85

The correlation between SCHG and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHG vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHG
DGRW

Technology

46.7%
32.1%

Communication Services

15.3%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
7.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
12.8%

Financial Services

6.6%
11.3%

Industrials

6.0%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
6.7%

Basic Materials

1.3%
3.3%

Energy

0.7%
5.0%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Utilities

0.4%
0.2%

Technology

SCHG
46.7%
DGRW
32.1%

Communication Services

SCHG
15.3%
DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHG
12.4%
DGRW
7.1%

Healthcare

SCHG
8.4%
DGRW
12.8%

Financial Services

SCHG
6.6%
DGRW
11.3%

Industrials

SCHG
6.0%
DGRW
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

SCHG
1.6%
DGRW
6.7%

Basic Materials

SCHG
1.3%
DGRW
3.3%

Energy

SCHG
0.7%
DGRW
5.0%

Real Estate

SCHG
0.5%
DGRW

-

Utilities

SCHG
0.4%
DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHGDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.90

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

7.97

-5.15

SCHG vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-32.04%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-8.30%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-16.21%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-17.27%

-17.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-32.04%

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

-3.20%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-3.01%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

1.98%

+3.09%

Volatility

SCHG vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.72%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

3.72%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

8.21%

+4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

10.26%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

14.00%

+8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

16.19%

+5.38%

SCHG vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHG vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than DGRW's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.29%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.40%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHG and DGRW have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to DGRW (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.62% vs 14.19% for DGRW. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.62% return vs 14.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.40% for SCHG.

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer