SCHF vs. VO
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.24%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for VO. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
SCHF vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 9.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.24%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
VO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 17.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
SCHF vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 12.60% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 9.06% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and VO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SCHF and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHF vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
VO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
SCHF
VO
Technology
SCHF
VO
Industrials
SCHF
VO
Healthcare
SCHF
VO
Basic Materials
SCHF
VO
Energy
SCHF
VO
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
VO
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
VO
Communication Services
SCHF
VO
Utilities
SCHF
VO
Real Estate
SCHF
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
VO
SCHF vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHF | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.10 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 7.96 | +1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHF | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.37 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.43 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.61 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.50 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -58.87% | +24.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -8.17% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -19.02% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -27.57% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -39.37% | +4.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -1.68% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -7.86% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.15% | +0.83% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 3.50%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 3.50% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 9.47% | +4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 12.49% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 17.62% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 18.95% | -1.75% |
SCHF vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHF vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than VO's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.04% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and VO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to VO (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.49% vs 10.24% for SCHF. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.37% for VO.
SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.03% for VO.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer